Literature DB >> 6760642

Autosuture of low colorectal anastomosis.

S Fasth, H Hedlund, G Svaninger, L Hultén.   

Abstract

The safety of low colorectal anastomosis constructed with autosuture technique (U.S. EEA-stapling device, USSC) and the functional results were assessed in consecutive series of patients operated upon for rectal carcinoma. The operative procedure was greatly facilitated and certainly, many of the patients would otherwise have been subjected to abdominoperineal resection with permanent colostomy. Clinical leaks were observed in 4 of the 25 patients (16%) and another 4 patients were shown to have subclinical leaks, as demonstrated by endoscopy and/or X-ray. The total incidence of leaks was therefore 32% (8/25). Even when constructed with the autosuture technique a low anastomosis should probably be protected by a proximal enterostomy. There was a general tendency to anastomic narrowing during the initial period but in most patients stenosis disappeared with time after closure of the enterostomy. Frequent endoscopic examinations and dilatation of the anastomosis during the early postoperative period may be advantageous. The immediate functional results were unsatisfactory with increased frequency and varying grades of incontinence. Although these disturbances improved with time the results at six months after surgery were still not satisfactory and for confidence many patients wore a pad.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6760642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Chir Scand        ISSN: 0001-5482


  6 in total

1.  Predictive factors of stenosis after stapled colorectal anastomosis: prospective analysis of 179 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Guillermo C Bannura; Miguel Angel G Cumsille; Alejandro E Barrera; Jaime P Contreras; Carlos L Melo; Daniel C Soto
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Healing of esophagojejunal anastomoses after experimental total gastrectomy. A comparative study using manually sutured or stapled anastomoses.

Authors:  B Walther; P Löwenhielm; S E Strand; F Ståhlberg; B Uvelius; J Oscarson; A Evander
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Compression anastomosis revisited: prospective audit of short- and medium-term outcomes in 62 rectal anastomoses.

Authors:  Bernhard Dauser; Thomas Winkler; Gerhard Loncsar; Friedrich Herbst
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Colorectal anastomotic stricture: is it associated with inadequate colonic mobilization?

Authors:  A Hiranyakas; G Da Silva; P Denoya; S Shawki; S D Wexner
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Endoscopic treatment of postoperative colorectal anastomotic strictures.

Authors:  K L Suchan; A Muldner; B C Manegold
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-05-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Efficacy of dilatations for anastomotic colorectal stenoses: prognostic factors.

Authors:  S Pucciarelli; P Toppan; P L Pilati; A Piccoli; F Chemello; M Lise
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.571

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.