Literature DB >> 19116090

Approach to the small renal mass: weighing treatment options.

Brian M Benway1, Sam B Bhayani.   

Abstract

The increased detection of incidental renal masses has introduced new challenges into the management of patients with newly discovered renal masses. Much interest has been focused on the diagnostic accuracy and the prognostic ability of imaging studies. These studies have elucidated trends that can guide management but remain woefully inaccurate for predicting the exceptions to the rule, many of which can produce untoward outcomes. Renal biopsy may aid in the management of patients with indeterminate -imaging; however, the role of biomarkers remains unclear. Active surveillance has emerged as an attractive option in certain patient populations, although the lack of reliable predictors of tumor behavior based upon currently available surveillance techniques understandably raises concerns about its propriety. For patients who would benefit from operative management, nephron-sparing procedures such as ablation and partial nephrectomy have gained increasing acceptance as an alternative to radical nephrectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19116090     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-009-0004-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  49 in total

1.  Watchful waiting for solid renal masses: insight into the natural history and results of delayed intervention.

Authors:  Erik Kouba; Angela Smith; Daniel McRackan; Eric M Wallen; Raj S Pruthi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  The natural history of untreated renal masses.

Authors:  Paul L Crispen; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Pathological stage does not alter the prognosis for renal lesions determined to be stage T1 by computerized tomography.

Authors:  William W Roberts; Sam B Bhayani; Mohamad E Allaf; Theresa Y Chan; Louis R Kavoussi; Thomas W Jarrett
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Biopsy of the small renal mass: time to shift the clinical paradigm?

Authors:  Seth A Strope; J Stuart Wolf
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.498

5.  Pathological features of renal neoplasms classified by size and symptomatology.

Authors:  Bruce Schlomer; Robert S Figenshau; Yan Yan; Ramakrishna Venkatesh; Sam B Bhayani
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Reevaluation of TNM staging of renal cortical tumors: recurrence and survival for T1N0M0 and T3aN0M0 tumors are equivalent.

Authors:  Scott M Gilbert; Alana M Murphy; Aaron E Katz; Erik T Goluboff; Ihor S Sawczuk; Carl A Olsson; Mitchell C Benson; James M McKiernan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Surgical outcomes of partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a joint study by the Japanese Society of Renal Cancer.

Authors:  Yutaka Senga; Seiichiro Ozono; Hayakazu Nakazawa; Satoshi Nagamori; Ken Marumo; Shigeo Horie; Tetsuro Onishi; Noriomi Miyao; Masahiro Nakao; Tatsuo Igarashi; Tomoyasu Tsushima; Michihiko Hasegawa; Masaru Murai
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.369

Review 8.  Complications of percutaneous abdominal fine-needle biopsy. Review.

Authors:  E H Smith
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Active surveillance of renal masses in elderly patients.

Authors:  Robert Abouassaly; Brian R Lane; Andrew C Novick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Disease outcome in patients with low stage renal cell carcinoma treated with nephron sparing or radical surgery.

Authors:  S E Lerner; C A Hawkins; M L Blute; A Grabner; P C Wollan; J T Eickholt; H Zincke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  5 in total

1.  Urinary biomarkers for the early diagnosis of kidney cancer.

Authors:  Jeremiah J Morrissey; Amy N London; Jingqin Luo; Evan D Kharasch
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Nondestructive Diagnosis of Kidney Cancer on 18-gauge Core Needle Renal Biopsy Using Dual-color Fluorescence Structured Illumination Microscopy.

Authors:  James Liu; Mei Wang; David Tulman; Sree H Mandava; Katherine N Elfer; Andrew Gabrielson; Weil Lai; Caleb Abshire; Andrew B Sholl; J Quincy Brown; Benjamin R Lee
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Discrepancy between radiological and pathological size of renal masses.

Authors:  Nicola N Jeffery; Norbert Douek; Ding Y Guo; Manish I Patel
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 4.  Management and outcomes of tumor recurrence after focal ablation renal therapy.

Authors:  Alberto Breda; Christine Anterasian; Arie Belldegrun
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.619

5.  The current role of renal biopsy in the management of localized renal tumors.

Authors:  Gagan Gautam; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.