Literature DB >> 15591998

Evaluation of transfer impressions for osseointegrated implants at various angulations.

Wirley Gonçalves Assuncao1, Humberto Gennari Filho, Osvaldo Zaniquelli.   

Abstract

The accuracy of impressions that transfer the relationship of the implant to the metal framework of the prosthesis continues to be a problem. This study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of the transfer process under variable conditions with regard to implant analog angulations, impression materials, and techniques. Replicas (n = 60) of a metal matrix (control) containing four implants at 90 degrees , 80 degrees , 75 degrees , and 65 degrees in relation to the horizontal surface were obtained by using three impression techniques: T1-indirect technique with conical copings in closed trays; T2-direct technique with square copings in open trays; and T3-square copings splinted with autopolymerizing acrylic resin; and four elastomers: "P"-polysulfide; "I"-polyether; "A"-addition silicone; and "Z"-condensation silicone. The values of the implant analog angulations were assessed by a profilometer to the nearest 0.017 degrees , then submitted to analysis of variance for comparisons at significance of 5% (P < .05). For implant analog at 90 degrees , the material "A" associated with T2 and material "Z" with T3 behaved differently (P < .05) from all groups. At 80 degrees , all materials behaved differently (P < .01) with T1. At 75 degrees , when T1 was associated, materials "P" and "A" showed similar behavior, as well as materials "I" and "Z"; however, "P" and "A" were different from "I" and "Z" (P < .01). When T3 was associated, all experimental groups behaved differently among them (P < .01). At 65 degrees , the materials "P" and "Z" behaved differently (P < .01) from the control group with T1, T2, and T3; the materials "I" and "A" behaved differently from the control group (P < .01) when T1 and T2, respectively, were associated. The more perpendicular the implant analog angulation is in relation to the horizontal surface, the more accurate the impression. The best materials were material "I" and "A" and the most satisfactory technique was technique 3.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15591998     DOI: 10.1097/01.id.0000144509.58901.f7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Implant Dent        ISSN: 1056-6163            Impact factor:   2.454


  23 in total

1.  Evaluation of impression accuracy for a four-implant mandibular model--a digital approach.

Authors:  Michael Stimmelmayr; Kurt Erdelt; Jan-Frederik Güth; Arndt Happe; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  A new device for impression transfer for non-parallel endosseus implants.

Authors:  Matteo Danza; Ilaria Zollino; Riccardo Guidi; Francesco Carinci
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2009-08-06

3.  Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit--an in vitro study.

Authors:  Michael Stimmelmayr; Jan-Frederik Güth; Kurt Erdelt; Daniel Edelhoff; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Passive Fit in Screw Retained Multi-unit Implant Prosthesis Understanding and Achieving: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Muaiyed Mahmoud Buzayan; Norsiah Binti Yunus
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-12-28

5.  Accuracy of a proposed implant impression technique using abutments and metal framework.

Authors:  Hyeok-Jae Lee; Young-Jun Lim; Chang-Whe Kim; Jung-Han Choi; Myung-Joo Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Clinical study evaluating the discrepancy of two different impression techniques of four implants in an edentulous jaw.

Authors:  Michael Stimmelmayr; Jan-Frederik Güth; Kurt Erdelt; Arndt Happe; Markus Schlee; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Effect of impression coping and implant angulation on the accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Si-Hoon Jo; Kyoung-Il Kim; Jae-Min Seo; Kwang-Yeob Song; Ju-Mi Park; Seung-Geun Ahn
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Effect of different impression materials and techniques on the dimensional accuracy of implant definitive casts.

Authors:  Behnaz Ebadian; Mansor Rismanchian; Badrosadat Dastgheib; Farshad Bajoghli
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

9.  Accuracy of different impression materials in parallel and nonparallel implants.

Authors:  Mahroo Vojdani; Kianoosh Torabi; Elham Ansarifard
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

10.  Dimensional accuracy of vinyl polyether and polyvinyl siloxane impression materials in direct implant impression technique for multiple dental implants.

Authors:  Rohini Rajendran; N Gopi Chander; Kuttae Vishwanathan Anitha; Balasubramanian Muthukumar
Journal:  Eur Oral Res       Date:  2021-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.