Literature DB >> 15590696

Relationship between gene expression and GC-content in mammals: statistical significance and biological relevance.

Marie Sémon1, Dominique Mouchiroud, Laurent Duret.   

Abstract

Mammalian chromosomes are characterized by large-scale variations of DNA base composition (the so-called isochores). In contradiction with previous studies, Lercher et al. (Hum. Mol. Genet., 12, 2411, 2003) recently reported a strong correlation between gene expression breadth and GC-content, suggesting that there might be a selective pressure favoring the concentration of housekeeping genes in GC-rich isochores. We reassessed this issue by examining in human and mouse the correlation between gene expression and GC-content, using different measures of gene expression (EST, SAGE and microarray) and different measures of GC-content. We show that correlations between GC-content and expression are very weak, and may vary according to the method used to measure expression. Such weak correlations have a very low predictive value. The strong correlations reported by Lercher et al. (2003) are because of the fact that they measured variables over neighboring genes windows. We show here that using gene windows artificially enhances the correlation. The assertion that the expression of a given gene depends on the GC-content of the region where it is located is therefore not supported by the data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15590696     DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddi038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  40 in total

1.  Selective acquisition and retention of genomic sequences by Pack-Mutator-like elements based on guanine-cytosine content and the breadth of expression.

Authors:  Ann A Ferguson; Dongyan Zhao; Ning Jiang
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Human gene organization driven by the coordination of replication and transcription.

Authors:  Maxime Huvet; Samuel Nicolay; Marie Touchon; Benjamin Audit; Yves d'Aubenton-Carafa; Alain Arneodo; Claude Thermes
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Dynamism in gene expression across multiple studies.

Authors:  Alexander A Morgan; Joel T Dudley; Tarangini Deshpande; Atul J Butte
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 3.107

4.  Measuring and detecting molecular adaptation in codon usage against nonsense errors during protein translation.

Authors:  Michael A Gilchrist; Premal Shah; Russell Zaretzki
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Testing whether metazoan tyrosine loss was driven by selection against promiscuous phosphorylation.

Authors:  Siddharth Pandya; Travis J Struck; Brian K Mannakee; Mary Paniscus; Ryan N Gutenkunst
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Evaluating stably expressed genes in single cells.

Authors:  Yingxin Lin; Shila Ghazanfar; Dario Strbenac; Andy Wang; Ellis Patrick; David M Lin; Terence Speed; Jean Y H Yang; Pengyi Yang
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 6.524

7.  Predicting target genes of non-coding regulatory variants with IRT.

Authors:  Zhenqin Wu; Nilah M Ioannidis; James Zou
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  The relationship among gene expression, the evolution of gene dosage, and the rate of protein evolution.

Authors:  Jean-François Gout; Daniel Kahn; Laurent Duret
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Both selective and neutral processes drive GC content evolution in the human genome.

Authors:  Uberto Pozzoli; Giorgia Menozzi; Matteo Fumagalli; Matteo Cereda; Giacomo P Comi; Rachele Cagliani; Nereo Bresolin; Manuela Sironi
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Predicting gene expression level from relative codon usage bias: an application to Escherichia coli genome.

Authors:  Uttam Roymondal; Shibsankar Das; Satyabrata Sahoo
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.