Literature DB >> 15590233

Choice and preference assessment research with people with severe to profound developmental disabilities: a review of the literature.

Helen I Cannella1, Mark F O'Reilly, Giulio E Lancioni.   

Abstract

Since the last major empirical review on choice interventions and preference assessments among people with severe to profound developmental disabilities (Lancioni, O'Reilly, & Emerson, 1996) the body of research in this area has grown extensively. This paper reviews thirty studies carried out between 1996 and 2002 that have been sorted into four categories. These categories are (a) building choice opportunities into daily contexts; (b) assessing the effects of choice making on various parameters of behavior; (c) assessing preferences; and (d) assessing the effectiveness of various preference assessment formats. The main findings in these studies were that choice interventions led to decreases in inappropriate behavior and increases in appropriate behavior, and that various preference assessments could be used to identify reinforcing stimuli. The findings are discussed in relation to technical and practical rehabilitation questions. Potential issues for future research are also examined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15590233     DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2004.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Dev Disabil        ISSN: 0891-4222


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of a self-instruction package for conducting stimulus preference assessments.

Authors:  Richard B Graff; Amanda M Karsten
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012

2.  Teaching receptive language skills: recommendations for instructors.

Authors:  Laura Grow; Linda LeBlanc
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2013

3.  An Evaluation of Assistive Technology in Determining Job-Specific Preference for Adults With Autism and Intellectual Disabilities.

Authors:  Edith Walsh; Helena Lydon; Jennifer Holloway
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2019-08-05

4.  Correspondence between single versus daily preference assessment outcomes and reinforcer efficacy under progressive-ratio schedules.

Authors:  Nathan A Call; Nicole M Trosclair-Lasserre; Addie J Findley; Andrea R Reavis; M Alice Shillingsburg
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012

5.  Innovation of a reinforcer preference assessment with the difficult to test.

Authors:  Muriel D Saunders; Richard R Saunders
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2011-03-15

6.  The Quality of Life for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Scale: Factor Analysis, MIMIC Modeling, and Cut-Off Score Analysis.

Authors:  Laura C Chezan; Jin Liu; Erik Drasgow; Ruyi Ding; Alexandro Magana
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2022-06-03

Review 7.  Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.

Authors:  Jordan D Lill; Mark D Shriver; Keith D Allen
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2021-04-30

8.  Microswitch programs for persons with multiple disabilities: an overview of the responses adopted for microswitch activation.

Authors:  Giulio E Lancioni; Nirbhay N Singh; Mark F O'Reilly; Doretta Oliva
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2005-07-19

9.  Assessing potency of high- and low-preference reinforcers with respect to response rate and response patterns.

Authors:  Becky Penrod; Michele D Wallace; Edwin J Dyer
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2008

10.  Stability of infants' preference for prosocial others: Implications for research based on single-choice paradigms.

Authors:  Tyler Nighbor; Carolynn Kohn; Matthew Normand; Henry Schlinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.