Literature DB >> 15589084

What is the risk of distress in palliative care survey research?

Jennifer Takesaka1, Roxane Crowley, David Casarett.   

Abstract

To determine whether caregivers believe that interviews about end-of-life care are distressing and to identify patient and respondent characteristics associated with an increased risk of distress, distress was assessed in four studies that used family interviews. The setting was four Medicare certified hospice organizations, the University of Pennsylvania Memory Disorders Clinic, and two nursing homes, and participants included 296 family members of seriously ill or recently deceased patients. For three of the studies, respondents described their distress on a 5-point scale. Distress was reported as either present or absent in the fourth study. Sixty-four respondents (22%) reported experiencing distress. Intensity of distress was higher for younger respondents (Spearman rho -0.16; P=0.013), younger patients (Spearman rho -0.28; P < 0.001), and family members of patients with cancer (mean 0.55 vs. 0.24; Rank sum test P < 0.001). In a multivariable model, after adjusting for study population, younger patient age and cancer diagnosis were independently associated with the severity of distress. Sensitive questions about death and dying are unlikely to cause distress for family members. Although the likelihood of distress is low overall, investigators recruiting from these populations may improve the research by incorporating methods to assess and manage distress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15589084     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  9 in total

1.  Gender, age and surgery as a treatment modality leads to higher distress in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Bejoy C Thomas; V NandaMohan; Madhvan K Nair; Manoj Pandey
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  A study to improve communication between clinicians and patients with advanced heart failure: methods and challenges behind the working to improve discussions about defibrillator management trial.

Authors:  Nathan E Goldstein; Jill Kalman; Jean S Kutner; Erik K Fromme; Mathew D Hutchinson; Hannah I Lipman; Daniel D Matlock; Keith M Swetz; Rachel Lampert; Omarys Herasme; R Sean Morrison
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Conducting research interviews with bereaved family carers: when do we ask?

Authors:  Brenda Bentley; Moira O'Connor
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.947

4.  In-advance end-of-life discussions and the quality of inpatient end-of-life care: a pilot study in bereaved primary caregivers of advanced cancer patients.

Authors:  Masanori Mori; Donna Ellison; Takamaru Ashikaga; Ursula McVeigh; Allan Ramsay; Steven Ades
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Ethical conduct of palliative care research: enhancing communication between investigators and institutional review boards.

Authors:  Amy P Abernethy; Warren H Capell; Noreen M Aziz; Christine Ritchie; Maryjo Prince-Paul; Rachael E Bennett; Jean S Kutner
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Emotional risks to respondents in survey research.

Authors:  Susan M Labott; Timothy P Johnson; Michael Fendrich; Norah C Feeny
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  End-of-life care research with bereaved informal caregivers--analysis of recruitment strategy and participation rate from a multi-centre validation study.

Authors:  Stephanie Stiel; Maria Heckel; Sonja Bussmann; Martin Weber; Christoph Ostgathe
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 3.234

8.  Does palliative care improve quality? A survey of bereaved family members.

Authors:  Laura P Gelfman; Diane E Meier; R Sean Morrison
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  Patient, caregiver, health professional and researcher views and experiences of participating in research at the end of life: a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature.

Authors:  Marjolein H Gysels; Catherine Evans; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 4.615

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.