Literature DB >> 15585386

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and the esophagogastric junction: positron emission tomography improves staging and prediction of survival in distant but not in locoregional disease.

Eero I T Sihvo1, Jari V Räsänen, M Juhani Knuuti, Heikki R I Minn, Markku E S Luostarinen, Tapio Viljanen, Martti A Färkkilä, Jarmo A Salo.   

Abstract

In adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction for prognostication and treatment allocation, one prerequisite is accurate pretreatment staging. This staging, we hypothesized, would be improved by the use of positron emission tomography (PET). After 55 patients suitable for radical esophageal resection were staged with PET, spiral computed tomography (CT), and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), results were compared with histopathology and with survival. Accuracy in detecting locoregional lymph node metastasis did not differ significantly between EUS (72%), PET (60%), and CT (58%). Adding PET to standard staging failed to improve the accuracy of N staging (P=0.250). In M staging, accuracy between CT (75%) and PET (76%) did not differ. The accuracy of combined studies of CT and PET and of EUS, CT, and PET were 87% (P=0.016 versus CT) and 91% (P=0.031 versus EUS and CT), respectively. Of the 55 patients, 19 (35%) had metastatic lesions. By combined use of CT and EUS and by combined use of CT, EUS, and PET, 8 and 14 (P=0.031), respectively, could be detected. In nodal disease without distant metastases, PET did not improve the prediction of survival. However, positive PET for distant metastasis by either positive EUS or CT predicts well the poor survival of these patients. The staging value of PET by itself in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is limited because of low accuracy for nodal and the lack of specificity for distant disease prognosis. Adding PET to standard staging does, however, improve detection of stage IV disease and its associated poor survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15585386     DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.09.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  29 in total

1.  Endoscopic ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of adenocarcinoma of the distal oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction.

Authors:  J T Salminen; M A Färkkilä; O J Rämö; V Toikkanen; J Simpanen; H Nuutinen; J A Salo
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  Positron emission tomography of esophageal carcinoma using (11)C-choline and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose: a novel method of preoperative lymph node staging.

Authors:  O Kobori; Y Kirihara; N Kosaka; T Hara
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Endoscopic mucosal resection of early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  C Ell; A May; L Gossner; O Pech; E Günter; G Mayer; R Henrich; M Vieth; H Müller; G Seitz; M Stolte
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Utility of positron emission tomography for the staging of patients with potentially operable esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  P Flamen; A Lerut; E Van Cutsem; W De Wever; M Peeters; S Stroobants; P Dupont; G Bormans; M Hiele; P De Leyn; D Van Raemdonck; W Coosemans; N Ectors; K Haustermans; L Mortelmans
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Endoscopic ultrasound in the staging of tumours of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction.

Authors:  D G Richards; T H Brown; J M Manson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  T N Walsh; N Noonan; D Hollywood; A Kelly; N Keeling; T P Hennessy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Limited resection for early adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  H J Stein; M Feith; J Mueller; M Werner; J R Siewert
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Preoperative staging of gastric cancer: comparison of endoscopic US and dynamic CT.

Authors:  J F Botet; C J Lightdale; A G Zauber; H Gerdes; S J Winawer; C Urmacher; M F Brennan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Fate of patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and the esophagogastric junction: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Eero I T Sihvo; Markku E Luostarinen; Jarmo A Salo
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Efficient stereospecific synthesis of no-carrier-added 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose using aminopolyether supported nucleophilic substitution.

Authors:  K Hamacher; H H Coenen; G Stöcklin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  The role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET imaging in upper gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  Tong Dai; Elizabeta Popa; Manish A Shah
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2014-09

2.  2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging evaluation of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar; Robert W Henderson; Peter S Conti
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  Role of ¹⁸F 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in upper gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Smyth; Manish A Shah
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  The early use of PET-CT alters the management of patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  R N Williams; S S Ubhi; C D Sutton; A L Thomas; J J Entwisle; D J Bowrey
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Radiologist experience and CT examination quality determine metastasis detection in patients with esophageal or gastric cardia cancer.

Authors:  E P M van Vliet; J J Hermans; W De Wever; M J C Eijkemans; E W Steyerberg; C Faasse; E P M van Helmond; A M de Leeuw; A C Sikkenk; A R de Vries; E H de Vries; E J Kuipers; P D Siersema
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Positron emission tomography changes management and prognostic stratification in patients with oesophageal cancer: results of a multicentre prospective study.

Authors:  B E Chatterton; I Ho Shon; A Baldey; N Lenzo; A Patrikeos; B Kelley; D Wong; J E Ramshaw; A M Scott
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Benchmark values for transthoracic esophagectomy are not set as the defined "best possible"-a validation study.

Authors:  Olli Helminen; Johanna Mrena; Eero Sihvo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Staging investigations for oesophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  E P M van Vliet; M H Heijenbrok-Kal; M G M Hunink; E J Kuipers; P D Siersema
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Maximum standardized uptake value on PET/CT in preoperative assessment of lymph node metastasis from thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Amos J M Ela Bella; Ya-Rui Zhang; Wei Fan; Kong-Jia Luo; Tie-Hua Rong; Peng Lin; Hong Yang; Jian-Hua Fu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2014-02-14

10.  A rare case of esophageal metastasis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Lauren M Rosati; Megan N Kummerlowe; Justin Poling; Amy Hacker-Prietz; Amol K Narang; Eun J Shin; Dung T Le; Elliot K Fishman; Ralph H Hruban; Stephen C Yang; Matthew J Weiss; Joseph M Herman
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.