Literature DB >> 15580448

Mini-laparoscopic appendectomy using a needle loop retractor offers optimal cosmetic results.

N Sato1, M Kojika, Y Yaegashi, Y Suzuki, M Kitamura, S Endo, K Saito.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Do conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) techniques provide truly satisfying results for patients and surgeons? We have devised a more advanced technique that improves cosmesis.
METHODS: A 2-mm scope is inserted at the umbilicus, and a 12-mm working trocar is inserted through a suprapubic incision placed below the line of pubic hair. A needle loop retractor (NLR) is inserted to hold the appendix in the lower right abdomen. In this NLR, a stainless steel wire is placed within a needle having a diameter of 2 mm. From the suprapubic trocar, a bipolar coagulator is inserted to transect the appendiceal mesentery. A series of 30 patients underwent this procedure.
RESULTS: There were no conversions to laparotomy and no intra- or postoperative complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic appendectomy using a 2-mm scope, suprapubic trocar, and an NLR yields optimal cosmetic results. For surgeons, the NLR allows the appendix to be held more firmly than then a 5- or 2-mm grasping forceps is used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15580448     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-8248-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  12 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: a prospective evaluation.

Authors:  O J McAnena; O Austin; P R O'Connell; W P Hederman; T F Gorey; J Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy.

Authors:  A Loh; R S Taylor
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Modified laparoscopic appendectomy in surgery. A report on 388 operations.

Authors:  F Götz; A Pier; C Bacher
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic appendectomy in 625 cases: from innovation to routine.

Authors:  A Pier; F Götz; C Bacher
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-03

5.  Minilaparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  B D Matthews; G Mostafa; K L Harold; K W Kercher; P R Reardon; B T Heniford
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.719

6.  Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis.

Authors:  D R Flum; A Morris; T Koepsell; E P Dellinger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-10-10       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Laparoscopic versus traditional appendectomy for suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  B D Schirmer; R E Schmieg; J Dix; S B Edge; J B Hanks
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Endoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  K Semm
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: between evidence and common sense.

Authors:  Ernst Eypasch; Stefan Sauerland; Rolf Lefering; Edmund A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.588

10.  Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy.

Authors:  J M Garbutt; N J Soper; W D Shannon; A Botero; B Littenberg
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1999-01
View more
  7 in total

1.  Optimal cosmetic results without increased operative risk.

Authors:  W T Ng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Cost-effective laparoscopic appendicectomy [corrected].

Authors:  M Duxbury; N Keeling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Minilaparoscopic appendectomy using a needle loop retractor offers optimal cosmetic results.

Authors:  K H in 't Hof; J F Lange; G Kazemier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Minilaparoscopic appendectomy using a new spiral needle.

Authors:  Ahmed E Lasheen; Reda Ezz; Khaled Safwat; Ayman Salem; Wesam Amr
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A SAGES technology and value assessment and pediatric committee evaluation of mini-laparoscopic instrumentation.

Authors:  Thom E Lobe; Lucian Panait; Giovanni Dapri; Peter M Denk; David Pechman; Luca Milone; Stefan Scholz; Bethany J Slater
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.453

6.  Two-port vs. three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy: A bridge to least invasive surgery.

Authors:  Ashwin Rammohan; Paramaguru Jothishankar; A B Manimaran; R M Naidu
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.407

7.  MINILAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY.

Authors:  Lúcio Américo Della Coletta; Bruno Ziade Gil; Renato Morato Zanatto
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2016-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.