Literature DB >> 11822857

Minilaparoscopic appendectomy.

B D Matthews1, G Mostafa, K L Harold, K W Kercher, P R Reardon, B T Heniford.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using 2-mm laparoscopic instruments in the treatment of appendicitis and to identify risk factors that may limit their use. Minilaparoscopic appendectomy was performed through a 2-mm port in the umbilicus for a videoendoscope, a 2-mm working port in the right upper quadrant, and a 5/12-mm suprapubic port for an endoscopic stapler. Minilaparoscopic appendectomy was attempted in 26 consecutive patients with appendicitis. Thirty-two consecutive patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic appendectomy with 5- and 10-mm instruments and videoendoscopes before the availability of 2-mm instrumentation were analyzed for comparison. Statistical comparisons were made by the Student t test and Fisher exact test. Differences were considered statistically significant at a P value less than 0.05. There were no conversions to an open appendectomy in the minilaparoscopic appendectomy or conventional laparoscopic appendectomy group. The mean operative time was 69.5 minutes for the minilaparoscopic appendectomy group and 85.5 minutes for the conventional laparoscopic appendectomy group (P = 0.02). The mean postoperative length of stay was 1.7 days for the minilaparoscopic appendectomy group and 2.5 days for the conventional laparoscopic appendectomy group (P = 0.08). There was no significant difference in the complication rates (P = 0.31). Minilaparoscopic appendectomy was completed in 13 (50.0%) patients. Independent risk factors (P = 0.05) for conversion to 5- or 10-mm ports were a retrocecal appendix and increasing patient age. There were no differences in the mean postoperative length of stay (P = 0.12) or complication rate (P = 0.39) between the two groups, but mean operative time was longer (P = 0.05) in the converted group. Perioperative outcomes for minilaparoscopic appendectomy are comparable to those of conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. The use of 2-mm instrumentation in the management of appendicitis is limited in patients with retrocecal appendicitis. Increasing patient age and a history of abdominal surgery may influence the need to convert 2-mm ports to 5- or 10-mm ports.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11822857     DOI: 10.1097/00129689-200112000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  9 in total

1.  Mini-laparoscopic appendectomy using a needle loop retractor offers optimal cosmetic results.

Authors:  N Sato; M Kojika; Y Yaegashi; Y Suzuki; M Kitamura; S Endo; K Saito
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Needlescopic versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Muhammad Shafique Sajid; Munir Ahmad Khan; Elizabeth Cheek; Mirza Khurrum Baig
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  A SAGES technology and value assessment and pediatric committee evaluation of mini-laparoscopic instrumentation.

Authors:  Thom E Lobe; Lucian Panait; Giovanni Dapri; Peter M Denk; David Pechman; Luca Milone; Stefan Scholz; Bethany J Slater
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 4.  Needlescopic appendectomy.

Authors:  A Chock; S Seslar; E Stoopen; A Tristan; H Hashish; J J Gonzalez; M E Franklin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  True single-port appendectomy: first experience with the "puppeteer technique".

Authors:  Kurt Eric Roberts
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Acute appendicitis: what is the gold standard of treatment?

Authors:  Cesare Ruffolo; Alain Fiorot; Giulia Pagura; Michele Antoniutti; Marco Massani; Ezio Caratozzolo; Luca Bonariol; Francesco Calia di Pinto; Nicolò Bassi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Minilaparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Nicola Di Lorenzo; Antonio Manzelli; Giorgio Coscarella; Maurizio Pietrantuono; Tomasz Marek Jarzembowski; Piero Marco Fisichella; Achille Lucio Gaspari
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Development of a Two Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy Technique at a Rural Hospital.

Authors:  Hugo J R Bonatti
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2019-05-19

9.  Two-port vs. three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy: A bridge to least invasive surgery.

Authors:  Ashwin Rammohan; Paramaguru Jothishankar; A B Manimaran; R M Naidu
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.407

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.