Literature DB >> 15578575

Sensing, signaling, and responding to DNA damage: organization of the checkpoint pathways in mammalian cells.

Lei Li1, Lee Zou.   

Abstract

The DNA damage and replication checkpoints are signaling mechanisms that regulate and coordinate cellular responses to genotoxic conditions. Unlike typical signal transduction mechanisms that respond to one or a few stimuli, checkpoints can be activated by a broad spectrum of extrinsically or intrinsically derived DNA damage or replication interference. Recent investigations have shed light on how the damage and replication checkpoints are able to respond to such diverse stimuli. The activation of checkpoints not only attenuates cell cycle progression but also facilitates DNA repair and recovery of faltered replication forks, thereby preventing DNA lesions from being converted to inheritable mutations. Recently, more checkpoint targets from the cell cycle and DNA replication apparatus have been identified, revealing the increasing complexity of the checkpoint control of the cell cycle. In this article, we discuss current models of the DNA damage and replication checkpoints and highlight recent advances in the field. 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15578575     DOI: 10.1002/jcb.20355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biochem        ISSN: 0730-2312            Impact factor:   4.429


  31 in total

1.  Homeobox B9 induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition-associated radioresistance by accelerating DNA damage responses.

Authors:  Naokazu Chiba; Valentine Comaills; Bunsyo Shiotani; Fumiyuki Takahashi; Toshiyuki Shimada; Ken Tajima; Daniel Winokur; Tetsu Hayashida; Henning Willers; Elena Brachtel; Maria D M Vivanco; Daniel A Haber; Lee Zou; Shyamala Maheswaran
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  E2F1 induces p19INK4d, a protein involved in the DNA damage response, following UV irradiation.

Authors:  Abel L Carcagno; Luciana E Giono; Mariela C Marazita; Daniela S Castillo; Nicolás Pregi; Eduardo T Cánepa
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 3.  Replication fork barriers: pausing for a break or stalling for time?

Authors:  Karim Labib; Ben Hodgson
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  The radiomimetic enediyne C-1027 induces unusual DNA damage responses to double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Daniel R Kennedy; Terry A Beerman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 5.  Cytometry of ATM activation and histone H2AX phosphorylation to estimate extent of DNA damage induced by exogenous agents.

Authors:  Toshiki Tanaka; Xuan Huang; H Dorota Halicka; Hong Zhao; Frank Traganos; Anthony P Albino; Wei Dai; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.355

6.  Coordination of cell cycle, DNA repair and muscle gene expression in myoblasts exposed to genotoxic stress.

Authors:  Marta Simonatto; Lorenzo Giordani; Fabrizia Marullo; Giulia Claudia Minetti; Pier Lorenzo Puri; Lucia Latella
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 7.  Role of 53BP1 in the regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice.

Authors:  Arun Gupta; Clayton R Hunt; Sharmistha Chakraborty; Raj K Pandita; John Yordy; Deepti B Ramnarain; Nobuo Horikoshi; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 8.  Impaired DNA damage response--an Achilles' heel sensitizing cancer to chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Authors:  Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz; Frank Traganos; Donald Wlodkowic
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-10-18       Impact factor: 4.432

9.  DNA damage mediated s and g(2) checkpoints in human embryonal carcinoma cells.

Authors:  XiaoQi Wang; Vincent C H Lui; Ronnie T P Poon; Ping Lu; Randy Y C Poon
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 10.  Genomic instability and DNA damage responses in progeria arising from defective maturation of prelamin A.

Authors:  Phillip R Musich; Yue Zou
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.