Literature DB >> 15578547

Metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty with a cemented femoral component: a 7-10 year follow-up study.

Paul E Beaulé1, Michel Le Duff, Pat Campbell, Fred J Dorey, Sang Hyun Park, Harlan C Amstutz.   

Abstract

Forty-two McMinn metal-on-metal surface arthroplasties were implanted in 23 males and 16 females, average age 47.5 years old. The overall survivorship at 7 years was 79%; with any reoperation surgery as endpoint, 80%; and 93%; with aseptic loosening of the socket and femoral component, respectively. The average Surface Arthroplasty Risk Index of patients who had failed or were at risk of failing on the femoral side was significantly greater than for the rest of the cohort, 3.9 versus 1.9. The overall survivorship of the McMinn component was unacceptably low, with the majority of failures occurring with the cemented acetabular components. The recent reintroduction of surface arthroplasty of the hip using metal-on-metal bearings and cementless acetabular components may benefit young patients with hip arthritis with appropriate patient selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15578547     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  19 in total

1.  Bone mineral density in the femoral neck increases after hip resurfacing: a cohort with five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Charles A Willis-Owen; Henry D Atkinson; Roger D Oakeshott
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-08-22       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  [Results for endoprosthetic care in patients younger than 50 years].

Authors:  J Ziegler; M Amlang; M Bottesi; S Kirschner; W-C Witzleb; K-P Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Role of the extraosseus blood supply in osteoarthritic femoral heads?

Authors:  Ralf Schoeniger; Norman Espinosa; Rafael J Sierra; Michael Leunig; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  [Revision surgery of hip resurfacing].

Authors:  K-P Günther; W-C Witzleb; M Stiehler; S Kirschner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Surface replacement is comparable to primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mike S McGrath; David R Marker; Thorsten M Seyler; Slif D Ulrich; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: risk factors for failure over 25 years.

Authors:  Eric J Yue; Miguel E Cabanela; Gavan P Duffy; Michael G Heckman; Mary I O'Connor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  [Reasons for failure of hip resurfacing implants. A failure analysis based on 250 revision specimens].

Authors:  M M Morlock; N Bishop; F Stahmer; J Zustin; G Sauter; M Hahn; M Krause; W Rüther; M Amling
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  The learning curve for adopting hip resurfacing among hip specialists.

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Jinjun Zhu; Peter J Brooks; C Anderson Engh; Stephen J Raterman; John S Rogerson; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Impingement in Total Hip Replacement: Mechanisms and Consequences.

Authors:  Thomas D Brown; John J Callaghan
Journal:  Curr Orthop       Date:  2008-12-01

10.  Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.