M Hassan-Alin1, T Andersson, M Niazi, K Röhss. 1. Experimental Medicine, AstraZeneca R & D Mölndal, 43183, Mölndal, Sweden. mohammed.hassan-alin@astrazeneca.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pharmacokinetics of S-omeprazole (esomeprazole), R-omeprazole and racemic omeprazole following single and repeated oral doses of 20 mg and 40 mg of each compound in healthy male and female subjects. METHODS: In an open, randomised, three-way, cross-over study, 12 subjects received 20 mg and another 12 subjects received 40 mg S-omeprazole, R-omeprazole and racemicomeprazole as oral solutions once daily for 5 days, separated by washout periods of at least 10 days. Blood samples were taken for analysis pre-dose and at selected time points during a 12-h period following drug administration on study day 1 and day 5. Pharmacokinetic parameters of S-omeprazole, R-omeprazole, racemic omeprazole and the two main metabolites (5-hydroxy and sulphone) were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. RESULTS: Following the 20-mg dose of each compound, values of the total area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) were 1.52, 0.62 and 1.04 micromol h/l for S-omeprazole, R-omeprazole and racemic omeprazole, respectively, on day 1. Respectively, AUC values on day 5 were 2.84, 0.68 and 1.63 micromol h/l. Corresponding values after the 40-mg doses were 3.88, 1.39 and 2.44 micromol h/l on day 1 and 9.32, 1.80 and 5.79 micromol h/l on day 5. CONCLUSION: Treatment with S-omeprazole (esomeprazole; 20 mg and 40 mg) resulted in higher AUC values than with either R-omeprazole or racemic omeprazole after both single and repeated doses due to a lower metabolic rate of S-omeprazole than R-omeprazole and, consequently, racemic omeprazole. S-Omeprazole, R-omeprazole and the racemate were well tolerated.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pharmacokinetics of S-omeprazole (esomeprazole), R-omeprazole and racemic omeprazole following single and repeated oral doses of 20 mg and 40 mg of each compound in healthy male and female subjects. METHODS: In an open, randomised, three-way, cross-over study, 12 subjects received 20 mg and another 12 subjects received 40 mg S-omeprazole, R-omeprazole and racemic omeprazole as oral solutions once daily for 5 days, separated by washout periods of at least 10 days. Blood samples were taken for analysis pre-dose and at selected time points during a 12-h period following drug administration on study day 1 and day 5. Pharmacokinetic parameters of S-omeprazole, R-omeprazole, racemic omeprazole and the two main metabolites (5-hydroxy and sulphone) were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. RESULTS: Following the 20-mg dose of each compound, values of the total area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) were 1.52, 0.62 and 1.04 micromol h/l for S-omeprazole, R-omeprazole and racemic omeprazole, respectively, on day 1. Respectively, AUC values on day 5 were 2.84, 0.68 and 1.63 micromol h/l. Corresponding values after the 40-mg doses were 3.88, 1.39 and 2.44 micromol h/l on day 1 and 9.32, 1.80 and 5.79 micromol h/l on day 5. CONCLUSION: Treatment with S-omeprazole (esomeprazole; 20 mg and 40 mg) resulted in higher AUC values than with either R-omeprazole or racemic omeprazole after both single and repeated doses due to a lower metabolic rate of S-omeprazole than R-omeprazole and, consequently, racemic omeprazole. S-Omeprazole, R-omeprazole and the racemate were well tolerated.
Authors: T Lind; L Rydberg; A Kylebäck; A Jonsson; T Andersson; G Hasselgren; J Holmberg; K Röhss Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: T Andersson; J O Miners; M E Veronese; W Tassaneeyakul; W Tassaneeyakul; U A Meyer; D J Birkett Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 1993-12 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Fang Wu; Lu Gaohua; Ping Zhao; Masoud Jamei; Shiew-Mei Huang; Edward D Bashaw; Sue-Chih Lee Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2014-03-04 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Hiba L Tappouni; John C Rublein; Brian J Donovan; Stephanie B Hollowell; Hsiao-Chuan Tien; Sherene S Min; Dickens Theodore; Naser L Rezk; Philip C Smith; Melanie N Tallman; Ralph H Raasch; Angela D M Kashuba Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Date: 2008-03-01 Impact factor: 2.637
Authors: Kate McKeage; Stephanie K A Blick; Jamie D Croxtall; Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson; Gillian M Keating Journal: Drugs Date: 2008 Impact factor: 9.546