Literature DB >> 11475467

Pharmacokinetic studies with esomeprazole, the (S)-isomer of omeprazole.

T Andersson1, M Hassan-Alin, G Hasselgren, K Röhss, L Weidolf.   

Abstract

This article reviews the pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole, the (S)-isomer of the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) omeprazole. Esomeprazole is the first single isomer PPI developed for the treatment of patients with acid-related diseases. In vitro experiments in human liver microsomes demonstrated that the formation of the hydroxy and 5-O-desmethyl metabolites of esomeprazole is via cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19, whereas that of the sulphone metabolite is via CYP3A4. The formation rate of the hydroxy metabolite from esomeprazole is lower than for (R)-omeprazole, but that of the 2 other metabolites is higher, demonstrating stereoselective metabolism. The sum of the intrinsic clearances of all 3 metabo- lites for esomeprazole was one-third of that for (R)-omeprazole, suggesting lower clearance of esomeprazole in vivo. In vivo investigations demonstrated that esomeprazole is chirally stable after administration. Esomeprazole is 97% bound to plasma proteins. In normal (extensive) metabolisers with regard to CYP2C19, esomeprazole is metabolised more slowly than omeprazole, resulting in a higher area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) after administration of the same dose. This is more pronounced after repeated administration rather than after a single dose. In poor metabolisers, the AUC is lower for esomeprazole than for omeprazole, contributing to less overall interindividual variability for esomeprazole than for omeprazole. In general, esomeprazole and omeprazole are subject to the same metabolic transformations. Almost complete recoveries were reported and the ratio between urinary and faecal excretion is about 4:1 for both compounds. The dose-dependent increase in AUC of esomeprazole with repeated administration results from a combination of decreased first-pass elimination and decreased systemic clearance. Patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease exhibit a pharmacokinetic pattern similar to that in healthy individuals, whereas elderly individuals exhibited a slightly lower metabolism rate. Patients with a severe deficit in their liver function had a lower rate of metabolism, as would be expected, whereas those with mild to moderate liver disease did not exhibit any alteration in the pharmacokinetics. The pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole in individuals with impaired renal function is unlikely to differ from that in healthy individuals. A slight sex difference in the pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole was demonstrated in that the AUC and peak plasma drug concentration were slightly, but not statistically significantly, higher in females than in males.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11475467     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200140060-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  12 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole after oral and intravenous administration of single and repeated doses to healthy subjects.

Authors:  M Hassan-Alin; T Andersson; E Bredberg; K Röhss
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Pharmacokinetics and effect on caffeine metabolism of the proton pump inhibitors, omeprazole, lansoprazole, and pantoprazole.

Authors:  T Andersson; J Holmberg; K Röhss; A Walan
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Esomeprazole provides improved acid control vs. omeprazole In patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  T Lind; L Rydberg; A Kylebäck; A Jonsson; T Andersson; G Hasselgren; J Holmberg; K Röhss
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 8.171

4.  Esomeprazole improves healing and symptom resolution as compared with omeprazole in reflux oesophagitis patients: a randomized controlled trial. The Esomeprazole Study Investigators.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; G W Falk; D A Johnson; C Schmitt; D W Collins; J Whipple; D D'Amico; B Hamelin; B Joelsson
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 8.171

5.  Pharmacokinetic study of esomeprazole in the elderly.

Authors:  G Hasselgren; M Hassan-Alin; T Andersson; C Claar-Nilsson; K Röhss
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Comparison of the kinetic disposition and metabolism of E3810, a new proton pump inhibitor, and omeprazole in relation to S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylation status.

Authors:  S Yasuda; Y Horai; Y Tomono; H Nakai; C Yamato; K Manabe; K Kobayashi; K Chiba; T Ishizaki
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and interactions of acid pump inhibitors. Focus on omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole.

Authors:  T Andersson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Pharmacokinetics of [14C]omeprazole in patients with impaired renal function.

Authors:  J Naesdal; T Andersson; G Bodemar; R Larsson; C G Regårdh; I Skånberg; A Walan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Identification of human liver cytochrome P450 isoforms mediating secondary omeprazole metabolism.

Authors:  T Andersson; J O Miners; M E Veronese; D J Birkett
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Effect of omeprazole--a gastric proton pump inhibitor--on pentagastrin stimulated acid secretion in man.

Authors:  T Lind; C Cederberg; G Ekenved; U Haglund; L Olbe
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  60 in total

1.  Safety profile of enantiomers vs. racemic mixtures: it's the same?

Authors:  Céline Caillet; Laurence Chauvelot-Moachon; Jean-Louis Montastruc; Haleh Bagheri
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Intravenous esomeprazole.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating; David P Figgitt
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Daytime intragastric acid control: post hoc analyses of esomeprazole 20 mg and over-the-counter proton-pump inhibitors.

Authors:  Philip Katz; Peter J Kahrilas; David A Johnson; Tore Lind; Kerstin Röhss; Barry Traxler; Vincent Hugo; John Dent
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.409

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetic drug interaction profiles of proton pump inhibitors.

Authors:  Henning Blume; Frank Donath; André Warnke; Barbara S Schug
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 8-week comparative trial of low-dose esomeprazole (20 mg) and standard-dose omeprazole (20 mg) in patients with erosive esophagitis.

Authors:  Charles J Lightdale; Colleen Schmitt; Clara Hwang; Bernard Hamelin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 8-week comparative trial of standard doses of esomeprazole (40 mg) and omeprazole (20 mg) for the treatment of erosive esophagitis.

Authors:  Colleen Schmitt; Charles J Lightdale; Clara Hwang; Bernard Hamelin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Ethnic or racial differences revisited: impact of dosage regimen and dosage form on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Mei-Ling Chen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Induction of CYP2C19 and CYP3A activity following repeated administration of efavirenz in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  V Michaud; E Ogburn; N Thong; A O Aregbe; T C Quigg; D A Flockhart; Z Desta
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  A pharmacokinetic study comparing single and repeated oral doses of 20 mg and 40 mg omeprazole and its two optical isomers, S-omeprazole (esomeprazole) and R-omeprazole, in healthy subjects.

Authors:  M Hassan-Alin; T Andersson; M Niazi; K Röhss
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 10.  Single-isomer drugs: true therapeutic advances.

Authors:  Tommy Andersson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.