PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to develop a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for each omeprazole enantiomer that accounts for nonlinear PK of the two enantiomers as well as omeprazole racemic drug. METHODS: By integrating in vitro, in silico and human PK data, we first developed PBPK models for each enantiomer. Simulation of racemic omeprazole PK was accomplished by combining enantiomer models that allow mutual drug interactions to occur. RESULTS: The established PBPK models for the first time satisfactorily predicted the nonlinear PK of esomeprazole, R-omeprazole and the racemic drug. The modeling exercises revealed that the strong time-dependent inhibition of CYP2C19 by esomeprazole greatly altered the R-omeprazole PK following administration of racemic omeprazole as in contrast to R-omeprazole given alone. When PBPK models incorporated both autoinhibition of each enantiomer and mutual interactions, the ratios between predicted and observed AUC following single and multiple dosing of omeprazole were 0.97 and 0.94, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PBPK models of omeprazole enantiomers and racemic drug were developed. These models can be utilized to assess CYP2C19-mediated drug and genetic interaction potential for omeprazole and esomeprazole.
PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to develop a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for each omeprazole enantiomer that accounts for nonlinear PK of the two enantiomers as well as omeprazole racemic drug. METHODS: By integrating in vitro, in silico and human PK data, we first developed PBPK models for each enantiomer. Simulation of racemic omeprazole PK was accomplished by combining enantiomer models that allow mutual drug interactions to occur. RESULTS: The established PBPK models for the first time satisfactorily predicted the nonlinear PK of esomeprazole, R-omeprazole and the racemic drug. The modeling exercises revealed that the strong time-dependent inhibition of CYP2C19 by esomeprazole greatly altered the R-omeprazole PK following administration of racemic omeprazole as in contrast to R-omeprazole given alone. When PBPK models incorporated both autoinhibition of each enantiomer and mutual interactions, the ratios between predicted and observed AUC following single and multiple dosing of omeprazole were 0.97 and 0.94, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PBPK models of omeprazole enantiomers and racemic drug were developed. These models can be utilized to assess CYP2C19-mediated drug and genetic interaction potential for omeprazole and esomeprazole.
Authors: N Shirai; T Furuta; Y Moriyama; H Okochi; K Kobayashi; M Takashima; F Xiao; K Kosuge; K Nakagawa; H Hanai; K Chiba; K Ohashi; T Ishizaki Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Ping Zhao; Manuela de L T Vieira; Joseph A Grillo; Pengfei Song; Ta-Chen Wu; Jenny H Zheng; Vikram Arya; Eva Gil Berglund; Arthur J Atkinson; Yuichi Sugiyama; K Sandy Pang; Kellie S Reynolds; Darrell R Abernethy; Lei Zhang; Lawrence J Lesko; Shiew-Mei Huang Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Peng Duan; Fang Wu; Jason N Moore; Jeffrey Fisher; Victor Crentsil; Daniel Gonzalez; Lei Zhang; Gilbert J Burckart; Jian Wang Journal: CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol Date: 2018-12-05