Literature DB >> 15574829

EAnnot: a genome annotation tool using experimental evidence.

Li Ding1, Aniko Sabo, Nicolas Berkowicz, Rekha R Meyer, Yoram Shotland, Mark R Johnson, Kymberlie H Pepin, Richard K Wilson, John Spieth.   

Abstract

The sequence of any genome becomes most useful for biological experimentation when a complete and accurate gene set is available. Gene prediction programs offer an efficient way to generate an automated gene set. Manual annotation, when performed by experienced annotators, is more accurate and complete than automated annotation. However, it is a laborious and expensive process, and by its nature, introduces a degree of variability not found with automated annotation. EAnnot (Electronic Annotation) is a program originally developed for manually annotating the human genome. It combines the latest bioinformatics tools to extract and analyze a wide range of publicly available data in order to achieve fast and reliable automatic gene prediction and annotation. EAnnot builds gene models based on mRNA, EST, and protein alignments to genomic sequence, attaches supporting evidence to the corresponding genes, identifies pseudogenes, and locates poly(A) sites and signals. Here, we compare manual annotation of human chromosome 6 with annotation performed by EAnnot in order to assess the latter's accuracy. EAnnot can readily be applied to manual annotation of other eukaryotic genomes and can be used to rapidly obtain an automated gene set.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15574829      PMCID: PMC534675          DOI: 10.1101/gr.3152604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  30 in total

1.  RefSeq and LocusLink: NCBI gene-centered resources.

Authors:  K D Pruitt; D R Maglott
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Optimal spliced alignment of homologous cDNA to a genomic DNA template.

Authors:  J Usuka; W Zhu; V Brendel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Patterns of variant polyadenylation signal usage in human genes.

Authors:  E Beaudoing; S Freier; J R Wyatt; J M Claverie; D Gautheret
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Integrating genomic homology into gene structure prediction.

Authors:  I Korf; P Flicek; D Duan; M R Brent
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Selecting for functional alternative splices in ESTs.

Authors:  Zhengyan Kan; David States; Warren Gish
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Comparative gene prediction in human and mouse.

Authors:  Genís Parra; Pankaj Agarwal; Josep F Abril; Thomas Wiehe; James W Fickett; Roderic Guigó
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Ensembl 2002: accommodating comparative genomics.

Authors:  M Clamp; D Andrews; D Barker; P Bevan; G Cameron; Y Chen; L Clark; T Cox; J Cuff; V Curwen; T Down; R Durbin; E Eyras; J Gilbert; M Hammond; T Hubbard; A Kasprzyk; D Keefe; H Lehvaslaiho; V Iyer; C Melsopp; E Mongin; R Pettett; S Potter; A Rust; E Schmidt; S Searle; G Slater; J Smith; W Spooner; A Stabenau; J Stalker; E Stupka; A Ureta-Vidal; I Vastrik; E Birney
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  A major effect QTL determined by multiple genes in epileptic EL mice.

Authors:  M E Legare; F S Bartlett; W N Frankel
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Novel protein domains and repeats in Drosophila melanogaster: insights into structure, function, and evolution.

Authors:  C P Ponting; R Mott; P Bork; R R Copley
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  The mammalian gene collection.

Authors:  R L Strausberg; E A Feingold; R D Klausner; F S Collins
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Advances in the sequencing of the genome of the adenophorean nematode Trichinella spiralis.

Authors:  M Mitreva; D P Jasmer
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.234

2.  Gene expression analysis distinguishes tissue-specific and gender-related functions among adult Ascaris suum tissues.

Authors:  Zhengyuan Wang; Xin Gao; John Martin; Yong Yin; Sahar Abubucker; Amy C Rash; Ben-Wen Li; Bill Nash; Kym Hallsworth-Pepin; Douglas P Jasmer; Makedonka Mitreva
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 3.291

3.  The canine hookworm genome: analysis and classification of Ancylostoma caninum survey sequences.

Authors:  Sahar Abubucker; John Martin; Yong Yin; Lucinda Fulton; Shiaw-Pyng Yang; Kym Hallsworth-Pepin; J Spencer Johnston; John Hawdon; James P McCarter; Richard K Wilson; Makedonka Mitreva
Journal:  Mol Biochem Parasitol       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 1.759

4.  The draft genome of the parasitic nematode Trichinella spiralis.

Authors:  Makedonka Mitreva; Douglas P Jasmer; Dante S Zarlenga; Zhengyuan Wang; Sahar Abubucker; John Martin; Christina M Taylor; Yong Yin; Lucinda Fulton; Pat Minx; Shiaw-Pyng Yang; Wesley C Warren; Robert S Fulton; Veena Bhonagiri; Xu Zhang; Kym Hallsworth-Pepin; Sandra W Clifton; James P McCarter; Judith Appleton; Elaine R Mardis; Richard K Wilson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Combined evidence annotation of transposable elements in genome sequences.

Authors:  Hadi Quesneville; Casey M Bergman; Olivier Andrieu; Delphine Autard; Danielle Nouaud; Michael Ashburner; Dominique Anxolabehere
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Histoplasma capsulatum proteome response to decreased iron availability.

Authors:  Michael S Winters; Daniel S Spellman; Qilin Chan; Francisco J Gomez; Margarita Hernandez; Brittany Catron; Alan G Smulian; Thomas A Neubert; George S Deepe
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 2.480

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.