Literature DB >> 15574098

The effect of different warm-up stretch protocols on 20 meter sprint performance in trained rugby union players.

Iain M Fletcher1, Bethan Jones.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of different static and dynamic stretch protocols on 20-m sprint performance. The 97 male rugby union players were assigned randomly to 4 groups: passive static stretch (PSS; n = 28), active dynamic stretch (ADS; n = 22), active static stretch (ASST; n = 24), and static dynamic stretch (SDS; n = 23). All groups performed a standard 10-minute jog warm-up, followed by two 20-m sprints. The 20-m sprints were then repeated after subjects had performed different stretch protocols. The PSS and ASST groups had a significant increase in sprint time (p < or = 0.05), while the ADS group had a significant decrease in sprint time (p < or = 0.05). The decrease in sprint time, observed in the SDS group, was found to be nonsignificant (p > or = 0.05). The decrease in performance for the 2 static stretch groups was attributed to an increase in the musculotendinous unit (MTU) compliance, leading to a decrease in the MTU ability to store elastic energy in its eccentric phase. The reason why the ADS group improved performance is less clear, but could be linked to the rehearsal of specific movement patterns, which may help increase coordination of subsequent movement. It was concluded that static stretching as part of a warm-up may decrease short sprint performance, whereas active dynamic stretching seems to increase 20-m sprint performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15574098     DOI: 10.1519/14493.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  36 in total

1.  Current concepts in muscle stretching for exercise and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Phil Page
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-02

2.  Gradual decline in performance and changes in biochemical parameters of basketball players while resting after warm-up.

Authors:  Christos Galazoulas; Anastasia Tzimou; Georgios Karamousalidis; Vassilis Mougios
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  The effect of different dynamic stretch velocities on jump performance.

Authors:  Iain M Fletcher
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Effects of secondary warm up following stretching.

Authors:  Alan J Pearce; Dawson J Kidgell; James Zois; John S Carlson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Effects of different warm-up programs on golf performance in elite male golfers.

Authors:  Nigel R Tilley; Alison Macfarlane
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-08

6.  Effects of the 11+ and Harmoknee Warm-up Programs on Physical Performance Measures in Professional Soccer Players.

Authors:  Abdolhamid Daneshjoo; Abdul Halim Mokhtar; Nader Rahnama; Ashril Yusof
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Acute effects of pre-event lower limb massage on explosive and high speed motor capacities and flexibility.

Authors:  Ramiz Arabaci
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

8.  Stretch and sprint training reduces stretch-induced sprint performance deficits in 13- to 15-year-old youth.

Authors:  A Chaouachi; K Chamari; P Wong; C Castagna; M Chaouachi; I Moussa-Chamari; D G Behm
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  The effects of different stretching techniques of the quadriceps muscles on agility performance in female collegiate soccer athletes: a pilot study.

Authors:  H W Wallmann; C B Gillis; N J Martinez
Journal:  N Am J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2008-02

10.  The effects of different durations of static stretching within a comprehensive warm-up on voluntary and evoked contractile properties.

Authors:  Jonathan C Reid; Rebecca Greene; James D Young; Daniel D Hodgson; Anthony J Blazevich; David G Behm
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.