Literature DB >> 26860097

A comparison of revision and rerupture rates of ACL reconstruction between autografts and allografts in the skeletally immature.

Ian R Nelson1, Jason Chen1, Rebecca Love2, Brent R Davis3, Gregory B Maletis4, Tadashi T Funahashi3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLRs) in skeletally immature patients are increasing. The purpose of this study is to describe the demographics, graft usage, revision, and re-operation rates in skeletally immature ACLRs in the Kaiser Permanente healthcare system.
METHODS: Skeletally immature patients (<17.0 years old with open physes) were identified using the Kaiser Permanente ACLR registry. Multi-ligament reconstructions and physeal-sparing ACLRs were excluded. Aseptic revision and same-knee re-operation were the outcomes of interest. Exposure of interest was graft type; bone-patellar-tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft, hamstring autograft, and any type of allograft. Age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and race were evaluated as confounders. Cox proportional hazard models stratified by surgeon were used to analyse the risk of revision and re-operation.
RESULTS: A total of 534 primary ACLR cases were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 2.9 years. The majority were hamstring autografts (n = 388, 72.7%), male (n = 339, 63.9%), and White (n = 232, 43.4%). Median age was 14.9 years, and median BMI was 21.9 kg/m(2). There were 44 (8.2%) aseptic revisions and 48 (9.0%) same-knee re-operations. The incidence rate for revision was BPTB autograft 5.5%, hamstring autograft 7.5%, and allograft 13.2%. After adjusting for confounders and surgeon clustering effect, the risk of aseptic revision and revision between allograft and hamstring autograft did not reach statistical significance.
CONCLUSION: Graft selection differs in skeletally immature patients with a preponderance of surgeries being performed with hamstring tendon autografts. High revision rates were identified for all graft types used, though differences in revision rates across different graft types did not reach statistical significance. Surgeons should be aware of high rates of revision in this skeletally immature young population, although type of graft used did not appear to make a difference. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allograft; Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Skeletally immature

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26860097     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4020-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  19 in total

1.  A prospective study of 80,000 total joint and 5000 anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in a community-based registry in the United States.

Authors:  Elizabeth W Paxton; Robert S Namba; Gregory B Maletis; Monti Khatod; Eric J Yue; Mark Davies; Richard B Low; Ronald W B Wyatt; Maria C S Inacio; T Ted Funahashi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  The outcome of operatively treated anterior cruciate ligament disruptions in the skeletally immature child.

Authors:  I K Lo; A Kirkley; P J Fowler; A Miniaci
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with open physes: 10-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Rafael Calvo; David Figueroa; Federico Gili; Alex Vaisman; Pablo Mocoçain; Maximiliano Espinosa; Agustín León; Sergio Arellano
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: association of graft choice with increased risk of early revision.

Authors:  G B Maletis; M C S Inacio; J L Desmond; T T Funahashi
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.082

5.  Comparison of community-based ACL reconstruction registries in the U.S. and Norway.

Authors:  Gregory B Maletis; Lars-Petter Granan; Maria C S Inacio; Tadashi T Funahashi; Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Trends in Pediatric and Adolescent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian C Werner; Scott Yang; Austin M Looney; Frank Winston Gwathmey
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

Review 7.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft choice: bone-tendon-bone versus hamstring: does it really matter? A systematic review.

Authors:  Kurt P Spindler; John E Kuhn; Kevin Blake Freedman; Charles E Matthews; Robert S Dittus; Frank E Harrell
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with open physes: early outcomes.

Authors:  Rick P Csintalan; Maria C S Inacio; Jamie L Desmond; Tadashi T Funahashi
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Intra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon allograft in the skeletally immature patient.

Authors:  Robin Fuchs; William Wheatley; John W Uribe; Keith S Hechtman; John E Zvijac; Matthias R Schurhoff
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Lower risk of revision with patellar tendon autografts compared with hamstring autografts: a registry study based on 45,998 primary ACL reconstructions in Scandinavia.

Authors:  Tone Gifstad; Olav A Foss; Lars Engebretsen; Martin Lind; Magnus Forssblad; Grethe Albrektsen; Jon Olav Drogset
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  13 in total

1.  Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletal immature children.

Authors:  Ole Gade Sørensen; Peter Faunø; Svend Erik Christiansen; Martin Lind
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients.

Authors:  Andrew Pennock; Michael M Murphy; Mark Wu
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12

3.  Gait mechanics and second ACL rupture: Implications for delaying return-to-sport.

Authors:  Jacob J Capin; Ashutosh Khandha; Ryan Zarzycki; Kurt Manal; Thomas S Buchanan; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Keep calm and carry on testing: a substantive reanalysis and critique of 'what is the evidence for and validity of return-to-sport testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis'.

Authors:  Jacob John Capin; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; May Arna Risberg; Hege Grindem
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 5.  On-Ice Return-to-Hockey Progression After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jacob J Capin; William Behrns; Karen Thatcher; Amelia Arundale; Angela Hutchinson Smith; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 4.751

6.  Italian consensus statement for the use of allografts in ACL reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Corrado Bait; Pietro Randelli; Riccardo Compagnoni; Paolo Ferrua; Rocco Papalia; Filippo Familiari; Andrea Tecame; Paolo Adravanti; Ezio Adriani; Enrico Arnaldi; Franco Benazzo; Massimo Berruto; Giovanni Bonaspetti; Gian Luigi Canata; Pier Paolo Canè; Araldo Causero; Giancarlo Coari; Matteo Denti; Maristella Farè; Andrea Ferretti; Marco Fravisini; Francesco Giron; Alberto Gobbi; Vincenzo Madonna; Andrea Manunta; Pier Paolo Mariani; Claudio Mazzola; Giuseppe Milano; Luigi Pederzini; Flavio Quaglia; Mario Ronga; Herbert Schönhuber; Giacomo Stefani; Piero Volpi; Giacomo Zanon; Raul Zini; Claudio Zorzi; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Which Metrics Are Being Used to Evaluate Children and Adolescents After ACL Reconstruction? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Peter D Fabricant; Christopher M Brusalis; Jonathan M Schachne; Matthew J Matava
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-07-22

Review 8.  Outcome Measures After ACL Injury in Pediatric Patients: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Mette K Zebis; Susan Warming; Maria B Pedersen; Marie H Kraft; S Peter Magnusson; Martin Rathcke; Michael Krogsgaard; Simon Døssing; Tine Alkjær
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-07-30

9.  Paediatric anterior cruciate ligament tears: management and growth disturbances. A survey of EPOS and POSNA membership.

Authors:  F Accadbled; G Gracia; P Laumonerie; C Thevenin-Lemoine; B E Heyworth; M S Kocher
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 1.548

10.  Management of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: What's In and What's Out?

Authors:  Benjamin Todd Raines; Emily Naclerio; Seth L Sherman
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.