Literature DB >> 24465098

Surgical treatment of fresh complete acromioclavicular dislocation by coracoid process transfer and k-wire transfixation.

Yeming Wang1, Jianguo Zhang1.   

Abstract

Acromioclavicular dislocations are very common shoulder injuries. The optimal treatment for acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint injury remains a matter of debate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of surgical treatment of complete acromioclavicular dislocation using coracoid process transfer and temporary K-wire transfixation. Twenty-one patients with complete acromioclavicular dislocation underwent coracoid process transfer and temporary K-wire transfixation. Patients were assessed at the follow-up based on visual analog scores (VAS), the Constant-Murley scoring system and the UCLA shoulder rating system. Radiographs were taken to check up vertical instability. The mean follow-up was 32.1 months (25-47 months). The mean Constant and Murley score and UCLA shoulder rating score was 89.9 ± 8.4 and 30.1 ± 4.4. There were fourteen excellent functional results and six results and one poor result. The overall rate of satisfaction, which means an excellent or good result, was 95.2 %. Nineteen patients (90.4 %) maintained their previous jobs or resume their daily activities. The mean final pain score, as measured from 1 to 10 on the visual analog scale, was 1.91 ± 1.09. The radiographic analysis revealed twenty patients had maintained reduction at the final follow-up. The coracoid process transfer and temporary K-wire transfixation is a reliable treatment for a complete acromioclavicular dislocation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acromioclavicular dislocation; Coracoid process transfer; K-wire

Year:  2012        PMID: 24465098      PMCID: PMC3900743          DOI: 10.1007/s12262-012-0605-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN: 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


  15 in total

1.  Anatomical acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison of reconstructive techniques of the acromioclavicular joint.

Authors:  Paul W Grutter; Steve A Petersen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Biomechanical comparison of a modified Weaver-Dunn and a free-tissue graft reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint complex.

Authors:  Michael G Michlitsch; Gregory J Adamson; Marilyn Pink; Allyson Estess; James A Shankwiler; Thay Q Lee
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Outcome of exact anatomic repair and coracoclavicular cortical lag screw in acute acromioclavicular dislocations.

Authors:  Yasser M Assaghir
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2011-09

4.  Treatment of acromioclavicular injuries, especially complete acromioclavicular separation.

Authors:  J K Weaver; H K Dunn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Acromioclavicular reconstruction using autogenous semitendinosus tendon graft: results of revision surgery in chronic cases.

Authors:  Mark Tauber; Manfred Eppel; Herbert Resch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Biomechanical rationale for development of anatomical reconstructions of coracoclavicular ligaments after complete acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Authors:  Ryan S Costic; Joanne E Labriola; Mark W Rodosky; Richard E Debski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Semitendinosus tendon graft versus a modified Weaver-Dunn procedure for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction in chronic cases: a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Mark Tauber; Katharina Gordon; Heiko Koller; Michael Fox; Herbert Resch
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Proximally based conjoined tendon transfer for coracoclavicular reconstruction in the treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation.

Authors:  Chunyan Jiang; Manyi Wang; Guowei Rong
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Coracoid process transfer for acromioclavicular dislocations. A report of 20 cases.

Authors:  B D Ferris; M Bhamra; D F Paton
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a comparative biomechanical study of the palmaris-longus tendon graft reconstruction with other augmentative methods in cadaveric models.

Authors:  Guntur E Luis; Chee-Khuen Yong; Deepak A Singh; S Sengupta; David Sk Choon
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 2.359

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Valentina Cardona; Valeria Vismara; Alessandra Scaini; Andrea G Salvi; Stefano Galli; Giacomo Marchi; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.