Literature DB >> 15572118

Face perception: domain specific, not process specific.

Galit Yovel1, Nancy Kanwisher.   

Abstract

Evidence that face perception is mediated by special cognitive and neural mechanisms comes from fMRI studies of the fusiform face area (FFA) and behavioral studies of the face inversion effect. Here, we used these two methods to ask whether face perception mechanisms are stimulus specific, process specific, or both. Subjects discriminated pairs of upright or inverted faces or house stimuli that differed in either the spatial distance among parts (configuration) or the shape of the parts. The FFA showed a much higher response to faces than to houses, but no preference for the configuration task over the part task. Similarly, the behavioral inversion effect was as large in the part task as the configuration task for faces, but absent in both part and configuration tasks for houses. These findings indicate that face perception mechanisms are not process specific for parts or configuration but are domain specific for face stimuli per se.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15572118     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.11.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  139 in total

1.  Neural tuning for face wholes and parts in human fusiform gyrus revealed by FMRI adaptation.

Authors:  Alison Harris; Geoffrey Karl Aguirre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Conceptual challenges and directions for social neuroscience.

Authors:  Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  The influence of natural contour and face size on the spatial frequency tuning for identifying upright and inverted faces.

Authors:  Jessica Royer; Verena Willenbockel; Caroline Blais; Frédéric Gosselin; Sandra Lafortune; Josiane Leclerc; Daniel Fiset
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-02

Review 4.  The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces.

Authors:  Nancy Kanwisher; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Diminished neural sensitivity to irregular facial expression in first-episode schizophrenia.

Authors:  Maya Bleich-Cohen; Rael D Strous; Raz Even; Pia Rotshtein; Galit Yovel; Iulian Iancu; Ahikam Olmer; Talma Hendler
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Seeing Jesus in toast: neural and behavioral correlates of face pareidolia.

Authors:  Jiangang Liu; Jun Li; Lu Feng; Ling Li; Jie Tian; Kang Lee
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Are Faces Special to Infants? An Investigation of Configural and Featural Processing for the Upper and Lower Regions of Houses in 3- to 7-month-olds.

Authors:  Paul C Quinn; James W Tanaka; Kang Lee; Olivier Pascalis; Alan M Slater
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2013-01-30

8.  Frontal contributions to face processing differences in autism: evidence from fMRI of inverted face processing.

Authors:  Susan Y Bookheimer; A Ting Wang; Ashley Scott; Marian Sigman; Mirella Dapretto
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.892

9.  Spatial Mechanisms within the Dorsal Visual Pathway Contribute to the Configural Processing of Faces.

Authors:  Valentinos Zachariou; Christine V Nikas; Zaid N Safiullah; Stephen J Gotts; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  What's in a face? Effects of stimulus duration and inversion on face processing in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Pamela D Butler; Arielle Tambini; Galit Yovel; Maria Jalbrzikowski; Rachel Ziwich; Gail Silipo; Nancy Kanwisher; Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 4.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.