Literature DB >> 15571736

Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability for stereoscopic slant rivalry and a comparison with grating, house-face, and Necker cube rivalry.

Raymond van Ee1.   

Abstract

A way to study conscious perception is to expose the visual system to an ambiguous stimulus that instigates bi-stable perception. This provides the opportunity to study neural underpinnings related to the percepts rather than to the stimulus. We have recently developed a slant-rivalry paradigm that has beneficial metrical (quantitative) aspects and that exhibits temporal aspects of perceptual reversals that seemed to be under considerable voluntary control of the observer. Here we examined a range of different aspects of the temporal dynamics of the perceptual reversals of slant rivalry and we compared these with the dynamics of orthogonal grating rivalry, house-face rivalry, and Necker cube rivalry. We found that slant rivalry exhibits a qualitatively similar pattern of dynamics. The drift of the perceptual reversal rate, both across successive experimental repetitions, and across successive 35-s portions of data were similar. The sequential dependence of the durations of perceptual phases, too, revealed very similar patterns. The main quantitative difference, which could make slant rivalry a useful stimulus for future neurophysiological studies, is that the percept durations are relatively long compared to the other rivalry stimuli. In the paper that accompanies this paper [van Ee, R., van Dam, L. C. J., Brouwer, G. J. (2005). Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability. Vision Research,] we focused on the role of voluntary control in the dynamics of perceptual reversals.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15571736     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  28 in total

Review 1.  United we sense, divided we fail: context-driven perception of ambiguous visual stimuli.

Authors:  P C Klink; R J A van Wezel; R van Ee
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Visual sensitivity underlying changes in visual consciousness.

Authors:  David Alais; John Cass; Robert P O'Shea; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Voluntarily controlled bi-stable slant perception of real and photographed surfaces.

Authors:  Raymond van Ee; Gunta Krumina; Sylvia Pont; Sanne van der Ven
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability.

Authors:  Rubén Moreno-Bote; John Rinzel; Nava Rubin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A gradient flow formulation for the stochastic Amari neural field model.

Authors:  Christian Kuehn; Jonas M Tölle
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  Experience-driven plasticity in binocular vision.

Authors:  P Christiaan Klink; Jan W Brascamp; Randolph Blake; Richard J A van Wezel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Early stages of figure-ground segregation during perception of the face-vase.

Authors:  Michael A Pitts; Antígona Martínez; James B Brewer; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Individual differences in sensory eye dominance reflected in the dynamics of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Jocelyn L Sy; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Effects of attention on visual experience during monocular rivalry.

Authors:  Eric A Reavis; Peter J Kohler; Gideon P Caplovitz; Thalia P Wheatley; Peter U Tse
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Bistable perception modeled as competing stochastic integrations at two levels.

Authors:  Guido Gigante; Maurizio Mattia; Jochen Braun; Paolo Del Giudice
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.