BACKGROUND: 1-2/1,000 newborns are affected by connatal permanent hearing impairment. Clinical diagnosis is often delayed. This demands newborn hearing screening (NHS). Some questions regarding the optimal method remain unsolved. METHODS: The newborns in the obstetrical department (low-risk group) are tested by automated transitory evoked otoacustic emissions (TEOAE). TEOAE-fail is followed by automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) examination. All sick newborns admitted to the pediatric department (high-risk group) are primarily tested using AABR. Pathological AABR-testing leads to pedaudiological diagnostic work-up. RESULTS: In the low-risk group, 82 out of 1,584 newborns failed TEOAE-testing (recall 5.18%). Only 5 of these patients failed consecutive AABR examination (recall 0.32%). Permanent hearing loss was finally confirmed in 3 children (0.13%). 10 out of 755 newborns in the high-risk group failed AABR-testing (1.32%). In 6 of these children, hearing loss was confirmed (0.79%). CONCLUSION: A two-tier screening process as described is able to reduce recall rate, overall expenses and parental anxiety.
BACKGROUND: 1-2/1,000 newborns are affected by connatal permanent hearing impairment. Clinical diagnosis is often delayed. This demands newborn hearing screening (NHS). Some questions regarding the optimal method remain unsolved. METHODS: The newborns in the obstetrical department (low-risk group) are tested by automated transitory evoked otoacustic emissions (TEOAE). TEOAE-fail is followed by automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) examination. All sick newborns admitted to the pediatric department (high-risk group) are primarily tested using AABR. Pathological AABR-testing leads to pedaudiological diagnostic work-up. RESULTS: In the low-risk group, 82 out of 1,584 newborns failed TEOAE-testing (recall 5.18%). Only 5 of these patients failed consecutive AABR examination (recall 0.32%). Permanent hearing loss was finally confirmed in 3 children (0.13%). 10 out of 755 newborns in the high-risk group failed AABR-testing (1.32%). In 6 of these children, hearing loss was confirmed (0.79%). CONCLUSION: A two-tier screening process as described is able to reduce recall rate, overall expenses and parental anxiety.
Authors: S Hoth; K Neumann; H Weissschuh; J Bräunert; P Böttcher; C Hornberger; H Maul; B Beedgen; K Buschmann; C Sohn; G Hoffmann; P Plinkert Journal: HNO Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 1.284
Authors: Amina Abdullahi; Nurudeen Adebola Shofoluwe; Adamu Abubakar; Mala Bukar Sandabe; Hamman Ibrahim Garandawa; Mohammed Ibrahim Babatunde; Raheem O Quadri Journal: J West Afr Coll Surg Date: 2022-06-22