Literature DB >> 11130392

False positives in universal neonatal screening for permanent childhood hearing impairment.

C Kennedy, L Kimm, R Thornton, A Davis.   

Abstract

High rates of false-positive neonatal screens for permanent childhood hearing impairment (PCHI) associated with raised hearing thresholds lead to unnecessary assessments of the baby, which may worry parents. False-positive rates need to be reduced, especially in view of the UK government's announcement that national neonatal screening will be introduced. We report screening criteria that give a six-fold reduction in false-positive rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11130392     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03267-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  12 in total

Review 1.  Universal neonatal hearing screening moving from evidence to practice.

Authors:  C Kennedy; D McCann
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Prevalence of permanent childhood hearing impairment in the United Kingdom and implications for universal neonatal hearing screening: questionnaire based ascertainment study.

Authors:  H M Fortnum; A Q Summerfield; D H Marshall; A C Davis; J M Bamford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-08

3.  [Two-tier screening process (TEOAE/AABR) reduces recall rates in newborn hearing screening].

Authors:  T Helge; E Werle; M Barnick; C Wegner; B Rühe; G Aust; R Rossi
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  [Universal hearing screening in newborns. Recommendations for organizing and conducting universal hearing screening for congenital hearing loss in Germany].

Authors: 
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  How effectively can clinical examination pick up congenital heart disease at birth?

Authors:  C Patton; E Hey
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 5.747

6.  Six month impact of false positives in an Australian infant hearing screening programme.

Authors:  Z Poulakis; M Barker; M Wake
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Universal neonatal audiological screening: experience of the University Hospital of Pisa.

Authors:  Paolo Ghirri; Annalisa Liumbruno; Sara Lunardi; Francesca Forli; Antonio Boldrini; Angelo Baggiani; Stefano Berrettini
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 2.638

8.  Newborn genetic screening for hearing impairment: a preliminary study at a tertiary center.

Authors:  Chen-Chi Wu; Chia-Cheng Hung; Shin-Yu Lin; Wu-Shiun Hsieh; Po-Nien Tsao; Chien-Nan Lee; Yi-Ning Su; Chuan-Jen Hsu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A conceptual framework for rationalized and standardized Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS) programs.

Authors:  Carlo Giacomo Leo; Pierpaolo Mincarone; Saverio Sabina; Giuseppe Latini; John B Wong
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.638

10.  Economic evaluation of newborn hearing screening: modelling costs and outcomes.

Authors:  Franz Hessel; Eva Grill; Petra Schnell-Inderst; Uwe Siebert; Silke Kunze; Andreas Nickisch; Hubertus von Voss; Jürgen Wasem
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2003-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.