Literature DB >> 12014891

Neonatal screening for hearing impairment.

P M Watkin1.   

Abstract

Over the last 25 years, technological developments have facilitated the implementation of neonatal screens for hearing impairment. Restricting tests to 10% of the cohort with risk factors enables detection of around 40% of congenital impairments. Critical review has therefore recommended universal screening targeting for identification all neonates with moderate or worse impairment. Both oto-acoustic emission and auditory brainstem response (ABR) recording make this possible. The emission test is very sensitive to mild impairments. Specificity critically depends upon the age of maternity testing, but a false positive rate of 8% at discharge is typical. This is reduced to <1% by implementing a second outpatient test, or an ABR before discharge. Both tests are required to identify auditory neuropathies. Widespread implementation will follow pilot trials that are currently being undertaken. The accurate assessment of screen positives, and appropriate habilitation for those identified, is also required. These needs are complex, and require further study if universal screening is to become routine. Copyright 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12014891     DOI: 10.1053/siny.2001.0081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Neonatol        ISSN: 1084-2756


  7 in total

Review 1.  Universal neonatal hearing screening moving from evidence to practice.

Authors:  C Kennedy; D McCann
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  [Two-tier screening process (TEOAE/AABR) reduces recall rates in newborn hearing screening].

Authors:  T Helge; E Werle; M Barnick; C Wegner; B Rühe; G Aust; R Rossi
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Transitory evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) and distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) outcomes from a three-stage newborn hearing screening protocol.

Authors:  M G Tzanakakis; T S Chimona; E Apazidou; C Giannakopoulou; G A Velegrakis; C E Papadakis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 0.471

4.  Effects of ambient air pollution, fresh fruit and vegetable intakes as well as maternal psychosocial stress on the outcome of newborn otoacoustic emission hearing screening.

Authors:  Bingzhi Chen; Shaoyi Chen; Lidan Duan; Muyang Zhang; Xiaoqun Liu; Yanying Duan
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.567

5.  Parental experiences of the newborn hearing screening programme in Wales: a postal questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Rosemary Fox; Sally Minchom
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  The effects of mode of delivery, maternal age, birth weight, gender and family history on screening hearing results: A cross sectional study.

Authors:  Hasan Ibrahim Al-Balas; Amjad Nuseir; Maha Zaitoun; Mahmoud Al-Balas; Almu'atasim Khamees; Hamzeh Al-Balas
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-03-26

7.  Universal neonatal audiological screening: experience of the University Hospital of Pisa.

Authors:  Paolo Ghirri; Annalisa Liumbruno; Sara Lunardi; Francesca Forli; Antonio Boldrini; Angelo Baggiani; Stefano Berrettini
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 2.638

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.