Literature DB >> 15562989

Scoring protein-protein docked structures based on the balance and tightness of binding.

Y H Yu1, B Z Lu, J G Han, P F Zhang.   

Abstract

One main issue in protein-protein docking is to filter or score the putative docked structures. Unlike many popular scoring functions that are based on geometric and energetic complementarity, we present a set of scoring functions that are based on the consideration of local balance and tightness of binding of the docked structures. These scoring functions include the force and moment acting on one component (ligand) imposed by the other (receptor) and the second order spatial derivatives of protein-protein interaction potential. The scoring functions were applied to the docked structures of 19 test targets including enzyme/inhibitor, antibody/antigen and other classes of protein complexes. The results indicate that these scoring functions are also discriminative for the near-native conformation. For some cases, such as antibody/antigen, they show more discriminative efficiency than some other scoring functions, such as desolvation free energy (deltaG(des)) based on pairwise atom-atom contact energy (ACE). The correlation analyses between present scoring functions and the energetic functions also show that there is no clear correlation between them; therefore, the present scoring functions are not essentially the same as energy functions.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15562989     DOI: 10.1023/b:jcam.0000046753.03033.3a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  23 in total

1.  Conservation of polar residues as hot spots at protein interfaces.

Authors:  Z Hu; B Ma; H Wolfson; R Nussinov
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-06-01

2.  Free energy calculations on dimer stability of the HIV protease using molecular dynamics and a continuum solvent model.

Authors:  W Wang; P A Kollman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-11-03       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Are free energy calculations useful in practice? A comparison with rapid scoring functions for the p38 MAP kinase protein system.

Authors:  D A Pearlman; P S Charifson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2001-10-11       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Protein docking using a genetic algorithm.

Authors:  E J Gardiner; P Willett; P J Artymiuk
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-07-01

5.  Free energy landscapes of encounter complexes in protein-protein association.

Authors:  C J Camacho; Z Weng; S Vajda; C DeLisi
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  A continuum model for protein-protein interactions: application to the docking problem.

Authors:  R M Jackson; M J Sternberg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-07-07       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Rapid refinement of protein interfaces incorporating solvation: application to the docking problem.

Authors:  R M Jackson; H A Gabb; M J Sternberg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-02-13       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 8.  Empirical potentials and functions for protein folding and binding.

Authors:  S Vajda; M Sippl; J Novotny
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.809

9.  Toward an outline of the topography of a realistic protein-folding funnel.

Authors:  J N Onuchic; P G Wolynes; Z Luthey-Schulten; N D Socci
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions.

Authors:  I D Kuntz; J M Blaney; S J Oatley; R Langridge; T E Ferrin
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-10-25       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.