Literature DB >> 10813815

Conservation of polar residues as hot spots at protein interfaces.

Z Hu1, B Ma, H Wolfson, R Nussinov.   

Abstract

A number of studies have addressed the question of which are the critical residues at protein-binding sites. These studies examined either a single or a few protein-protein interfaces. The most extensive study to date has been an analysis of alanine-scanning mutagenesis. However, although the total number of mutations was large, the number of protein interfaces was small, with some of the interfaces closely related. Here we show that although overall binding sites are hydrophobic, they are studded with specific, conserved polar residues at specific locations, possibly serving as energy "hot spots." Our results confirm and generalize the alanine-scanning data analysis, despite its limited size. Previously Trp, Arg, and Tyr were shown to constitute energetic hot spots. These were rationalized by their polar interactions and by their surrounding rings of hydrophobic residues. However, there was no compelling reason as to why specifically these residues were conserved. Here we show that other polar residues are similarly conserved. These conserved residues have been detected consistently in all interface families that we have examined. Our results are based on an extensive examination of residues which are in contact across protein interfaces. We utilize all clustered interface families with at least five members and with sequence similarity between the members in the range of 20-90%. There are 11 such clustered interface families, comprising a total of 97 crystal structures. Our three-dimensional superpositioning analysis of the occurrences of matched residues in each of the families identifies conserved residues at spatially similar environments. Additionally, in enzyme inhibitors, we observe that residues are more conserved at the interfaces than at other locations. On the other hand, antibody-protein interfaces have similar surface conservation as compared to their corresponding linear sequence alignment, consistent with the suggestion that evolution has optimized protein interfaces for function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10813815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  95 in total

1.  Identification of protein oligomerization states by analysis of interface conservation.

Authors:  A H Elcock; J A McCammon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Multiple diverse ligands binding at a single protein site: a matter of pre-existing populations.

Authors:  Buyong Ma; Maxim Shatsky; Haim J Wolfson; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  One site fits both: a model for the ternary complex of folate + NADPH in R67 dihydrofolate reductase, a D2 symmetric enzyme.

Authors:  E E Howell; U Shukla; S N Hicks; R D Smiley; L A Kuhn; M I Zavodszky
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Development of unified statistical potentials describing protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Hui Lu; Long Lu; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein-protein complexes.

Authors:  Tanja Kortemme; David Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Human proteome-scale structural modeling of E2-E3 interactions exploiting interface motifs.

Authors:  Gozde Kar; Ozlem Keskin; Ruth Nussinov; Attila Gursoy
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Are protein-protein interfaces more conserved in sequence than the rest of the protein surface?

Authors:  Daniel R Caffrey; Shyamal Somaroo; Jason D Hughes; Julian Mintseris; Enoch S Huang
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Protein-protein interactions: structurally conserved residues distinguish between binding sites and exposed protein surfaces.

Authors:  Buyong Ma; Tal Elkayam; Haim Wolfson; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Structure-based method for analyzing protein-protein interfaces.

Authors:  Ying Gao; Renxiao Wang; Luhua Lai
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2003-11-22       Impact factor: 1.810

10.  Structural mapping of protein interactions reveals differences in evolutionary pressures correlated to mRNA level and protein abundance.

Authors:  Matt Eames; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.