OBJECTIVE: Early identification of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with diabetes is important because these patients are at increased risk for CAD and have worse outcome than nondiabetic patients after CAD is diagnosed. Recently, noninvasive coronary angiography and assessment of left ventricular function has been demonstrated with multislice computed tomography (MSCT). The purpose of the present study was to validate this approach in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: MSCT was performed in 30 patients with confirmed type 2 diabetes. From the MSCT images, coronary artery stenoses (> or =50% luminal narrowing) and left ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction, regional wall motion) were evaluated and compared with results of conventional angiography and two-dimensional echocardiography. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty of 256 coronary artery segments (86%) were interpretable with MSCT. In these segments, sensitivity and specificity for detection of coronary artery stenoses were 95%. Including the uninterpretable segments, sensitivity and specificity were 81 and 82%, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis in the comparison of left ventricular ejection fractions demonstrated a mean difference of -0.48 +/- 3.8% for MSCT and echocardiography, which was not significantly different from 0. Agreement between the two modalities for assessment of regional contractile function was excellent (91%, kappa statistic 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Accurate noninvasive evaluation of both the coronary arteries and left ventricular function with MSCT is feasible in patients with type 2 diabetes. This noninvasive approach may allow optimal identification of high-risk patients.
OBJECTIVE: Early identification of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with diabetes is important because these patients are at increased risk for CAD and have worse outcome than nondiabeticpatients after CAD is diagnosed. Recently, noninvasive coronary angiography and assessment of left ventricular function has been demonstrated with multislice computed tomography (MSCT). The purpose of the present study was to validate this approach in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: MSCT was performed in 30 patients with confirmed type 2 diabetes. From the MSCT images, coronary artery stenoses (> or =50% luminal narrowing) and left ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction, regional wall motion) were evaluated and compared with results of conventional angiography and two-dimensional echocardiography. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty of 256 coronary artery segments (86%) were interpretable with MSCT. In these segments, sensitivity and specificity for detection of coronary artery stenoses were 95%. Including the uninterpretable segments, sensitivity and specificity were 81 and 82%, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis in the comparison of left ventricular ejection fractions demonstrated a mean difference of -0.48 +/- 3.8% for MSCT and echocardiography, which was not significantly different from 0. Agreement between the two modalities for assessment of regional contractile function was excellent (91%, kappa statistic 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Accurate noninvasive evaluation of both the coronary arteries and left ventricular function with MSCT is feasible in patients with type 2 diabetes. This noninvasive approach may allow optimal identification of high-risk patients.
Authors: Joanne D Schuijf; Nico R Mollet; Filippo Cademartiri; J Wouter Jukema; Hildo J Lamb; Albert de Roos; Ernst E van der Wall; Pim J de Feyter; Jeroen J Bax Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Roman Fischbach; Kai Uwe Juergens; Murat Ozgun; David Maintz; Matthias Grude; Harald Seifarth; Walter Heindel; Thomas Wichter Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-09-29 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jeffrey M Schussler; William D Dockery; Timothy R Moore; Kenneth B Johnson; Robert L Rosenthal; Robert C Stoler Journal: Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) Date: 2005-07
Authors: M M Henneman; J D Schuijf; J W Jukema; H J Lamb; A de Roos; P Dibbets; M P Stokkel; E E van der Wall; J J Bax Journal: Heart Date: 2006-06-01 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: F Cademartiri; E Maffei; A Palumbo; R Malagò; F Alberghina; A Aldrovandi; V Brambilla; G Runza; L La Grutta; A Menozzi; L Vignali; G Casolo; M Midiri; N R Mollet Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2007-10-21 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Roxana Djaberi; Joanne D Schuijf; Eric Boersma; Lucia J M Kroft; Alberto M Pereira; Johannes A Romijn; Arthur J Scholte; J Wouter Jukema; Jeroen J Bax Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-06-01 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Young Keun Ahn; Jung Min Ryu; Hea Chang Jeong; Yun Hyeon Kim; Myung Ho Jeong; Min Young Lee; Sang Hun Lee; Jae Hong Park; Seung Pil Yun; Ho Jae Han Journal: J Vet Sci Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 1.672