Literature DB >> 15561120

Arthroscopic single- versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using hamstring autograft.

Ching-Jen Wang1, Lin-Hsiu Weng, Chia-Chen Hsu, Yi-Sheng Chan.   

Abstract

This prospective study compared the clinical results of single- and double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. There were 35 patients including 19 single- and 16 double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using hamstring autograft. The average age was 29.4 +/- 13.6 years versus 28.2 +/- 10.4 years; and the average follow-up was 41.0 +/- 13.1 months versus 28.1 +/- 4.2 months for single- and double-bundle reconstruction, respectively. The indication for surgery was functional disability of the knee due to pain and instability as the result of high-energy PCL injury. The evaluation parameters included functional assessment, ligament laxity, functional score and radiographs of the knee. The results showed no significant difference in functional assessment, ligament laxity, functional score and radiographic changes of the knee between the two techniques. The rate of overall satisfaction with the operation was comparable from patient and surgeon perspectives. Contrary to many recent reports, the results of this study showed that single- and double-bundle PCL reconstruction using hamstring autograft produced comparable clinical results in medium-term follow-up. The difference between single- and double-bundle PCL reconstruction, if any, can be concluded only with long-term results and larger number of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15561120     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2003.10.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  25 in total

1.  [Double-bundle technique--anatomic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament].

Authors:  Alexander C Rauch; Philip B Schöttle; Knut Beitzel; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Computed tomography evaluation of the femoral and tibial attachments of the posterior cruciate ligament in vitro.

Authors:  Philippe Greiner; Robert A Magnussen; Sébastien Lustig; Guillaume Demey; Philippe Neyret; Elvire Servien
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Surgical management of PCL injuries: indications, techniques, and outcomes.

Authors:  Scott R Montgomery; Jared S Johnson; David R McAllister; Frank A Petrigliano
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-06

Review 4.  Single Versus Double-Bundle PCL Reconstruction: Scientific Rationale and Clinical Evidence.

Authors:  Christopher J Tucker; Patrick W Joyner; Nathan K Endres
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-06

5.  Both isolated and multi-ligament posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction results in improved subjective outcome: results from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry.

Authors:  Martin Lind; Torsten Grønbech Nielsen; Kristian Behrndtz
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  A comparison of arthroscopically assisted single and double bundle tibial inlay reconstruction for isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Oog Jin Shon; Dong Chul Lee; Chul Hyun Park; Won Ho Kim; Kwang Am Jung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-05-04

Review 7.  Review: femoral tunnel placement for PCL reconstruction in relation to the PCL fibre bundle attachments.

Authors:  Sunil Apsingi; Anthony M J Bull; David J Deehan; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Evaluating posterior cruciate ligament injury by using two-dimensional ultrasonography and sonoelastography.

Authors:  Lin-Yi Wang; Tsung-Hsun Yang; Yu-Chi Huang; Wen-Yi Chou; Chung-Cheng Huang; Ching-Jen Wang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Clinical studies on posterior cruciate ligament tears have weak design.

Authors:  Anne Marie Eriksen Watsend; Toril M Ø Osestad; Rune B Jakobsen; Rune B Jacobsen; Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  The posterior cruciate ligament: a study on its bony and soft tissue anatomy using novel 3D CT technology.

Authors:  Tom Van Hoof; Michiel Cromheecke; Thomas Tampere; Katharina D'herde; Jan Victor; Peter C M Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.