Literature DB >> 27145775

Evaluating posterior cruciate ligament injury by using two-dimensional ultrasonography and sonoelastography.

Lin-Yi Wang1,2,3, Tsung-Hsun Yang1,2, Yu-Chi Huang1,2, Wen-Yi Chou2,4,3, Chung-Cheng Huang5,6, Ching-Jen Wang7,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to elucidate the diagnostic criteria for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury using ultrasonography.
METHODS: Thirty-three patients with clinically suspected PCL injuries and 30 normal control subjects were recruited. Both groups were assessed using sonographic examination with reliability testing. Patients also underwent posterior stress radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). PCL thickness on two-dimensional ultrasonography (2D US), pixel intensity on sonoelastography, displacement on posterior stress view, and severity grading using MRI were analysed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted using MRI as the gold standard. Correlation coefficients among variables were calculated.
RESULTS: Good to excellent reliabilities were noted for 2D US and red pixel intensity on sonoelastography. In injured knees, PCL thicknesses were significantly greater, and red pixel intensities were significantly lower, compared to non-injured knees of patients and healthy controls. This indicates increased swelling and softness in injured PCLs. The area under the PCL thickness ROC curve was 0.917 (p < 0.001), and the best diagnostic criterion was a thickness ≥6.5 mm (90.6 % sensitivity and 86.7 % specificity). Thickness correlated with red pixel intensity, International Knee Documentation Committee examination grade, and MRI severity grading. In addition, effusions were detected on 2D US in all knees with "tears" of other structures on MRI.
CONCLUSIONS: 2D US is a useful tool to diagnose PCL injury, and PCL thickness ≥6.5 mm is the recommended diagnostic criterion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnosis; MRI; Posterior cruciate ligament; Sonoelastography; Ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27145775     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4139-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  28 in total

1.  Detection of knee effusion by ultrasonography.

Authors:  Bo Young Hong; Seong Hoon Lim; Ye Rim Cho; Hye Won Kim; Young Jin Ko; Seung Ho Han; Jong In Lee
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.159

2.  Detectable threshold of knee effusion by ultrasonography in osteoarthritis patients.

Authors:  Bo Young Hong; Jong In Lee; Hye Won Kim; Ye Rim Cho; Seong Hoon Lim; Young Jin Ko
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.159

Review 3.  Evaluation and treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injuries: revisited.

Authors:  William M Wind; John A Bergfeld; Richard D Parker
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Accuracy of stress radiography techniques in grading isolated and combined posterior knee injuries: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Guido Garavaglia; Anne Lubbeke; Victor Dubois-Ferrière; Domizio Suva; Daniel Fritschy; Jacques Menetrey
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 5.  "Soft, hard, or just right?" Applications and limitations of axial-strain sonoelastography and shear-wave elastography in the assessment of tendon injuries.

Authors:  C C Ooi; P Malliaras; M E Schneider; D A Connell
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Ultrasound elastography: the new frontier in direct measurement of muscle stiffness.

Authors:  Joline E Brandenburg; Sarah F Eby; Pengfei Song; Heng Zhao; Jeffrey S Brault; Shigao Chen; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) elastography quantification of muscle stiffness over a course of gradual isometric contractions: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Alpaslan Yavuz; Aydın Bora; Mehmet Deniz Bulut; Abdussamet Batur; Aysel Milanlioglu; Cemil Göya; Cagatay Andic
Journal:  Med Ultrason       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.611

8.  Ultrasonographic examination of the normal and injured posterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Chih-Chin Hsu; Wen-Chung Tsai; Carl Pai-Chu Chen; Wen-Lin Yeh; Simon Fuk-Tan Tang; Jun-Kung Kuo
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.910

9.  Role of high-resolution ultrasonography without and with real-time spatial compound imaging in evaluating the injured posterior cruciate ligament: preliminary study.

Authors:  F Sorrentino; A Iovane; A Nicosia; F Candela; M Midiri; R Lagalla
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance in identifying traumatic intraarticular knee lesions.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo Sanches Vaz; Olavo Pires de Camargo; Paulo José de Santana; Antonio Carlos Valezi
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 2.365

View more
  1 in total

1.  Efficiency of knee ultrasound for diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sun Hwa Lee; Seong Jong Yun
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 2.199

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.