Literature DB >> 15560998

Repeat FDG-PET after neoadjuvant therapy is a predictor of pathologic response in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Robert J Cerfolio1, Ayesha S Bryant, Thomas S Winokur, Buddhiwardhan Ohja, Alfred A Bartolucci.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Repeat positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and chest computed tomography (CT) are used to assess the effectiveness of chemoradiotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the change in the standardized uptake values (SUV) has not been correlated with the pathologic change of the primary tumor.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of a prospective database of 56 patients who had NSCLC, FDG-PET, and chest CT scans both before and after neoadjuvant therapy, followed by complete resection of their cancer. Maximum SUVs (maxSUV) and tumor size were measured, and the percentage of change was compared with the percentage of nonviable tumor cells. The primary objective was to measure the degree of correlation between these values.
RESULTS: The change in the maxSUV has a near linear relationship to the percent of nonviable tumor cells in the resected tumors. FDG-PET's maxSUV is better correlated to pathology than the change in size on CT scan (r2 = 0.75, r2 = 0.03, p < 0.001). When the maxSUV decreased by 80% or more, a complete pathologic response could be predicted with a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 96%.
CONCLUSIONS: The change in maxSUV on FDG-PET scan after neoadjuvant therapy holds a near linear relationship with pathologic response. It is a more accurate predictor than the change of size on CT scan. When the maxSUV decreases by 80% or more it is likely that the patient is a complete responder irrespective of cell type, neoadjuvant treatment, or the final absolute maxSUV. These findings may help guide treatment strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15560998     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.06.102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  35 in total

Review 1.  Computerized PET/CT image analysis in the evaluation of tumour response to therapy.

Authors:  W Lu; J Wang; H H Zhang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  The Role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography for Predicting Pathologic Response After Induction Therapy for Thymic Epithelial Tumors.

Authors:  Koichi Fukumoto; Takayuki Fukui; Toshiki Okasaka; Koji Kawaguchi; Shota Nakamura; Shuhei Hakiri; Naoki Ozeki; Tomoshi Sugiyama; Katsuhiko Kato; Kohei Yokoi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  PET imaging for Treatment Response in Cancer.

Authors:  Janet F Eary
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2008-01-01

4.  Urinary cell-free DNA as a prognostic marker for KRAS-positive advanced-stage NSCLC.

Authors:  F Xie; P Li; J Gong; H Tan; J Ma
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 5.  Monitoring chemotherapy and radiotherapy of solid tumors.

Authors:  Wolfgang A Weber; Hinrich Wieder
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Prognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancer patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and curative resection.

Authors:  Chen-Ping Hsieh; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Ching-Feng Wu; Jui-Ying Fu; Yun-Hen Liu; Yi-Cheng Wu; Cheng-Ta Yang; Ching-Yang Wu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Positron emission tomography/computerized tomography in lung cancer.

Authors:  Ilgin Sahiner; Gulin Ucmak Vural
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-06

8.  Standard uptake value and metabolic tumor volume of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT predict short-term outcome early in the course of chemoradiotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Tao Zhou; Li Ma; Hongfu Sun; Heyi Gong; Juan Wang; Jinming Yu; Baosheng Li
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  The use and misuse of positron emission tomography in lung cancer evaluation.

Authors:  Ching-Fei Chang; Afshin Rashtian; Michael K Gould
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.878

Review 10.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.

Authors:  Richard L Wahl; Heather Jacene; Yvette Kasamon; Martin A Lodge
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.