Literature DB >> 1555398

Auditory perception of conspecific and heterospecific vocalizations in birds: evidence for special processes.

R J Dooling1, S D Brown, G M Klump, K Okanoya.   

Abstract

Budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus), canaries (Serinus canaria), and zebra finches (Poephila guttata castanotis) were tested for their ability to discriminate among distance calls of each species. For comparison, starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) were tested on the same sounds. Response latencies to detect a change in a repeating background of sound were taken as a measure of the perceptual similarity among calls. All 4 species showed clear evidence of 3 perceptual categories corresponding to the calls of the 3 species. Also, budgerigars, canaries, and zebra finches showed an enhanced ability to discriminate among calls of their own species over the calls of the others. Starlings discriminated more efficiently among canary calls than among budgerigar or zebra finch calls. The results show species differences in discrimination of species-specific acoustic communication signals and provide insight into the nature of specialized perceptual processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1555398     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.106.1.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  17 in total

1.  Singing in the brain.

Authors:  P Marler; A J Doupe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Acoustic and perceptual categories of vocal elements in the warble song of budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  Hsiao-Wei Tu; Edward W Smith; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.231

3.  Distributed recognition of natural songs by European starlings.

Authors:  Daniel Knudsen; Jason V Thompson; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2010-11-01

Review 4.  Mechanisms of song perception in oscine birds.

Authors:  Daniel P Knudsen; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Do we hear what birds hear in birdsong?

Authors:  Robert J Dooling; Nora H Prior
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Personal information about danger trumps social information from avian alarm calls.

Authors:  Jessica R McLachlan; Chaminda P Ratnayake; Robert D Magrath
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Electrophysiological Evidence of Early Cortical Sensitivity to Human Conspecific Mimic Voice as a Distinct Category of Natural Sound.

Authors:  William J Talkington; Jeremy Donai; Alexandra S Kadner; Molly L Layne; Andrew Forino; Sijin Wen; Si Gao; Margeaux M Gray; Alexandria J Ashraf; Gabriela N Valencia; Brandon D Smith; Stephanie K Khoo; Stephen J Gray; Norman Lass; Julie A Brefczynski-Lewis; Susannah Engdahl; David Graham; Chris A Frum; James W Lewis
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Detection and discrimination of complex sounds by pigeons (Columba livia).

Authors:  Robert G Cook; Muhammad A J Qadri; Ryan Oliveira
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Auditory memory for temporal characteristics of sound.

Authors:  Melanie A Zokoll; Georg M Klump; Ulrike Langemann
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Spatial unmasking of birdsong in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  Micheal L Dent; Elizabeth M McClaine; Virginia Best; Erol Ozmeral; Rajiv Narayan; Frederick J Gallun; Kamal Sen; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.231

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.