Literature DB >> 15553654

Avoiding electromagnetic artifacts when recording auditory steady-state responses.

Terence W Picton1, M Sasha John.   

Abstract

Electromagnetic artifacts can occur when recording multiple auditory steady-state responses evoked by sinusoidally amplitude modulated (SAM) stimuli. High-intensity air-conducted stimuli evoked responses even when hearing was prevented by masking. Additionally, high-intensity bone-conducted stimuli evoked responses that were completely different from those evoked by air-conducted stimuli of similar sensory level. These artifacts were caused by aliasing since they did not occur when recordings used high analog-digital (AD) conversion rates or when high frequencies in the electroencephalographic (EEG) signal were attenuated by steep-slope low-pass filtering. Two possible techniques can displace aliased energy away from the response frequencies: (1) using an AD rate that is not an integer submultiple of the carrier frequencies and (2) using stimuli with frequency spectra that do not alias back to the response frequencies, such as beats or "alternating SAM" tones. Alternating SAM tones evoke responses similar to conventional SAM tones, whereas beats produce significantly smaller responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15553654     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.15.8.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  10 in total

1.  Determining the upper limits of stimulation for auditory steady-state response measurements.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Brenda M Hoover; Darcia M Dierking; Kathryn L Beauchaine; Carol Manning
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Using the auditory steady state response to record response amplitude curves. A possible fast objective method for diagnosing dead regions.

Authors:  Timothy Wilding; Colette McKay; Richard Baker; Terence Picton; Karolina Kluk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 3.  Cochlear implantation in the very young child: issues unique to the under-1 population.

Authors:  Maura Cosetti; J Thomas Roland
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-03

4.  Free-Field Cortical Steady-State Evoked Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Razieh Alemi; Sylvie Nozaradan; Alexandre Lehmann
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Auditory steady-state response and auditory brainstem response thresholds in children.

Authors:  DeWet Swanepoel; Shamim Ebrahim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Auditory steady state responses in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults: an analysis of between-session amplitude and latency repeatability, test time, and F ratio detection paradigms.

Authors:  Timothy S Wilding; Colette M McKay; Richard J Baker; Karolina Kluk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Using auditory steady-state responses for measuring hearing protector occlusion effect.

Authors:  Olivier Valentin; Frédéric Laville
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.867

8.  Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation.

Authors:  Olivier Valentin; Sasha M John; Frédéric Laville
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.867

9.  Are Auditory Steady-State Responses Useful to Evaluate Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss in Children?

Authors:  Signe Schuster Grasel; Edigar Rezende de Almeida; Roberto Miquelino de Oliveira Beck; Maria Valéria Schmidt Goffi-Gomez; Henrique Faria Ramos; Amanda Costa Rossi; Robinson Koji Tsuji; Ricardo Ferreira Bento; Rubens de Brito
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-18       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Attentional Modulation of Envelope-Following Responses at Lower (93-109 Hz) but Not Higher (217-233 Hz) Modulation Rates.

Authors:  Emma Holmes; David W Purcell; Robert P Carlyon; Hedwig E Gockel; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.