Literature DB >> 15553091

Position-associated GC asymmetry of gene duplicates.

Sergei N Rodin1, Dmitri V Parkhomchuk.   

Abstract

It is well known that repositioning of a gene often exerts a strong impact on its own expression and whole development. Here we report the results of genome-wide analyses suggesting that repositioning may also radically change the evolutionary fate of gene duplicates. As an indicator of these changes, we used the GC content of gene pairs which originated by duplication. This indicator turned out to be duplicate-asymmetric, which means that genes in a pair differ significantly in GC content despite their apparent origin from a common ancestor. Such an asymmetry necessarily implies that after duplication two originally identical genes mutated in opposite directions-toward GC-rich and GC-poor content, respectively. In mammalian genomes, this trend is definitely associated with presumably methylated hypermutable CpG sites, and in a typical GC-asymmetric gene pair, its two member genes are embedded in GC-contrasting isochores. However, we unexpectedly found similar significant GC asymmetry in fish, fly, worm, and yeast. This means that neither methylation alone nor methylation in combination with isochores can be counted as a primary cause of the GC asymmetry; rather they represent specific realizations of some universal principle of genome evolution. Remarkably, genes from pairs with the greatest GC asymmetry tend to be on different chromosomes, suggesting that the mutational difference between gene duplicates is associated with translocation of a new gene to a different place in the genome, whereas GC symmetric pairs demonstrate the opposite tendency. A recently emerged extra gene copy is usually on the same chromosome as is its parent but quickly, by 0.05 substitution per synonymous site, either has perished or occupies a different chromosome. During this earliest posttranslocation period, the ratio of nonsynonymous/synonymous base substitutions is unusually high, suggesting a rapid adaptive evolution of novel functions. In a general context of evolution by gene duplication, our interpretation of this position-dependent GC asymmetry between duplicated genes is that evolution of redundant genes toward a new function has often been associated with their very early, postduplication repositioning in the genome, with a concomitant abrupt change in epigenetic control of tissue/stage-specific expression and an increase in the mutation rate. Of eight eukaryotic genomes studied, the most distinguished in this respect is the human genome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15553091     DOI: 10.1007/s00239-004-2631-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  45 in total

Review 1.  Yesterday's polyploids and the mystery of diploidization.

Authors:  K H Wolfe
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations.

Authors:  A Force; M Lynch; F B Pickett; A Amores; Y L Yan; J Postlethwait
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Diversity in G + C content at the third position of codons in vertebrate genes and its cause.

Authors:  S Aota; T Ikemura
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1986-08-26       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  So much "junk" DNA in our genome.

Authors:  S Ohno
Journal:  Brookhaven Symp Biol       Date:  1972

5.  Correlation between molecular clock ticking, codon usage fidelity of DNA repair, chromosome banding and chromatin compactness in germline cells.

Authors:  J Filipski
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1987-06-15       Impact factor: 4.124

6.  Evolution of base composition in the insulin and insulin-like growth factor genes.

Authors:  D L Ellsworth; D Hewett-Emmett; W H Li
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 7.  A new method for estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous rates of nucleotide substitution considering the relative likelihood of nucleotide and codon changes.

Authors:  W H Li; C I Wu; C C Luo
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Cancerous hyper-mutagenesis in p53 genes is possibly associated with transcriptional bypass of DNA lesions.

Authors:  S N Rodin; A S Rodin; A Juhasz; G P Holmquist
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2002-12-29       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  Isochores and tissue-specificity.

Authors:  Alexander E Vinogradov
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Chromosomal speciation and molecular divergence--accelerated evolution in rearranged chromosomes.

Authors:  Arcadi Navarro; Nick H Barton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  6 in total

1.  Genome-wide analysis of the family 1 glycosyltransferases in cotton.

Authors:  Juan Huang; Chaoyou Pang; Shuli Fan; Meizhen Song; Jiwen Yu; Hengling Wei; Qifeng Ma; Libei Li; Chi Zhang; Shuxun Yu
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.291

2.  Adaptive Evolution Hotspots at the GC-Extremes of the Human Genome: Evidence for Two Functionally Distinct Pathways of Positive Selection.

Authors:  Clara S M Tang; Richard J Epstein
Journal:  Adv Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-05-03

3.  Histone modification pattern evolution after yeast gene duplication.

Authors:  Yangyun Zou; Zhixi Su; Wei Huang; Xun Gu
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Evolutionary patterns of recently emerged animal duplogs.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Ezawa; Kazuho Ikeo; Takashi Gojobori; Naruya Saitou
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 3.416

5.  Comparative Genomic Analysis of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Isolated from Different Niches.

Authors:  Bingyong Mao; Ruimin Yin; Xiaoshu Li; Shumao Cui; Hao Zhang; Jianxin Zhao; Wei Chen
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  Evolution of the highly networked deubiquitinating enzymes USP4, USP15, and USP11.

Authors:  Caitlyn Vlasschaert; Xuhua Xia; Josée Coulombe; Douglas A Gray
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.260

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.