Literature DB >> 15551534

The dosimetric verification of a pencil beam based treatment planning system.

T Knöös1, C Ceberg, L Weber, P Nilsson.   

Abstract

A new three-dimensional treatment planning system (TPS) based on convolution/superposition algorithms (TMS-Radix from HELAX AB, Uppsala, Sweden) was recently installed at the University Hospital in Lund. The purpose of the present study was to design a quality assurance and acceptance testing programme to meet the specific characteristics of this convolution model. The model is based on parametrization of a non-measurable quantity-the polyenergetic pencil beam. However, the verification of the treatment planning model is still dependent on numerous comparisons of measured depth-doses and dose profiles. The test programme was divided in two basic parts: (i) model implementation and beam data consistency and (ii) model performance and limitations in special situations. The first part was scheduled for all photon beam qualities available before they could be used for clinical treatment planning. The second part was performed for selected energies only. The results indicate clearly that the model is well suited for clinical three-dimensional dose planning and that the TPS handles data as expected. For example, calculated depth-doses for open and wedge beams at depths larger than the depth of dose maximum and profiles for open beams shows a very good agreement with measurements. However, depth-dose deviations at shallow depths, especially for high energies, were found. Monitor units calculated by the system were accurate for most fields except for very large fields, where deviations of several per cent were found.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 15551534     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/39/10/007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  11 in total

1.  The effect of slice thickness on target and organs at risk volumes, dosimetric coverage and radiobiological impact in IMRT planning.

Authors:  S P Srivastava; C-W Cheng; I J Das
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  An institutional experience of quality assurance of a treatment planning system on photon beam.

Authors:  Yıldıray Ozgüven; Kadir Yaray; Fadime Alkaya; Birsen Yücel; Serdar Soyuer
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-12-08

3.  A column-generation-based method for multi-criteria direct aperture optimization.

Authors:  Ehsan Salari; Jan Unkelbach
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Computed tomography imaging parameters for inhomogeneity correction in radiation treatment planning.

Authors:  Indra J Das; Chee-Wai Cheng; Minsong Cao; Peter A S Johnstone
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

5.  A comparison of three commercial IMRT treatment planning systems for selected paediatric cases.

Authors:  Ismail Eldesoky; Ehab M Attalla; Wael M Elshemey; Mohamed S Zaghloul
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Verification of dose calculations with a clinical treatment planning system based on a point kernel dose engine.

Authors:  Lars Weber; Per Nilsson
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Dosimetric verification of inverse planned step and shoot multileaf collimator fields from a commercial treatment planning system.

Authors:  M A MacKenzie; M Lachaine; B Murray; B G Fallone; D Robinson; G C Field
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Pencil-Beam Fluence Evaluation Based on Monte Carlo Simulations Algorithm of High Energetic Treatment Photons.

Authors:  Hossam Donya
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

9.  Validation of the preconfigured Varian Ethos Acuros XB Beam Model for treatment planning dose calculations: A dosimetric study.

Authors:  Yunfei Hu; Mikel Byrne; Ben Archibald-Heeren; Nick Collett; Guilin Liu; Trent Aland
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Dosimetric comparison of pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms in conformal lung radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yelda Elcim; Bahar Dirican; Omer Yavas
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.