Literature DB >> 15549277

Stimulant and relaxant drugs combined with stimulant and relaxant information: a study of active placebo.

Magne Arve Flaten1, Terje Simonsen, Kolbjørn Zahlsen, Trond Aamo, Georg Sager, Harald Olsen.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: The active placebo hypothesis states that placebo effects are potentiated when an active drug is administered.
OBJECTIVE: This hypothesis was tested in an experiment where information about the effect of a drug was combined with administration of an active drug or placebo.
METHODS: Information that a drug acted as a relaxant, a stimulant, or as a placebo was crossed with oral administration of a relaxant drug (700 mg carisoprodol), a stimulant drug (400 mg caffeine) or placebo (lactose) in healthy volunteers ( n=94). Dependent variables were subjective and physiological measures of arousal, as well as serum carisoprodol and caffeine levels. Data were collected from 15 to 280 min after administration of drug or placebo.
RESULTS: Caffeine increased alertness, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, startle blink reflexes, and skin conductance responses. Subjects were calmer after carisoprodol, and heart rate was increased. There was a positive correlation between increased arousal and carisoprodol levels when stimulant information had been provided. However, this was only seen when carisoprodol levels were very low. There was no evidence that caffeine modulated the placebo response.
CONCLUSIONS: Active placebo responses were seen only transiently when carisoprodol levels were low, and only in the subjective arousal data. Caffeine did not support active placebo responses. The overall findings did not favour the active placebo hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15549277     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-004-1886-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  16 in total

1.  Response variability to analgesics: a role for non-specific activation of endogenous opioids.

Authors:  Martina Amanzio; Antonella Pollo; Giuliano Maggi; Fabrizio Benedetti
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  DRUG-SET INTERACTION: PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF EPINEPHRINE UNDER DIFFERENTIAL EXPECTATIONS.

Authors:  S B PENICK; S FISHER
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1965 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.312

3.  Drug-related information generates placebo and nocebo responses that modify the drug response.

Authors:  M A Flaten; T Simonsen; H Olsen
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.312

4.  The effects of stimulant and tranquilizer placebos on healthy subjects in a real-life situation.

Authors:  D W Brodeur
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1965-05-21

5.  The interaction of drugs with placebos in the control of pain and anxiety.

Authors:  A J Dinnerstein; M Lowenthal; B Blitz
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  1966       Impact factor: 1.416

6.  Blockade of nocebo hyperalgesia by the cholecystokinin antagonist proglumide.

Authors:  F Benedetti; M Amanzio; C Casadio; A Oliaro; G Maggi
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  The interaction of psychologic stimuli and pharmacologic agents on airway reactivity in asthmatic subjects.

Authors:  T J Luparello; N Leist; C H Lourie; P Sweet
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1970 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.312

8.  Effects of caffeine, caffeine-associated stimuli, and caffeine-related information on physiological and psychological arousal.

Authors:  A Mikalsen; B Bertelsen; M A Flaten
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Beta-adrenoceptor regulation in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  G Sager; L Slørdal; N E Huseby; J Florholmen
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 1.713

10.  Catecholamine binding and concentrations in acute phase plasma after surgery.

Authors:  G Sager; T Trovik; L Slørdal; R Jaeger; P S Prytz; J Brox; O Reikerås
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 1.713

View more
  8 in total

1.  The effect of stress on absorption of acetaminophen.

Authors:  Magne Arve Flaten; Ole Asli; Terje Simonsen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Characterizing the subjective and psychomotor effects of carisoprodol in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  James P Zacny; Judith A Paice; Dennis W Coalson
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.533

3.  The CYP2C19 genotype and the use of oral contraceptives influence the pharmacokinetics of carisoprodol in healthy human subjects.

Authors:  Jørgen G Bramness; Svetlana Skurtveit; Margaretha Gulliksen; Harald Breilid; Vidar M Steen; Jørg Mørland
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Caffeine expectancies influence the subjective and behavioral effects of caffeine.

Authors:  Paul T Harrell; Laura M Juliano
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Interaction between expectancies and drug effects: an experimental investigation of placebo analgesia with caffeine as an active placebo.

Authors:  Espen Bjørkedal; Magne Arve Flaten
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Transforming Water: Social Influence Moderates Psychological, Physiological, and Functional Response to a Placebo Product.

Authors:  Alia J Crum; Damon J Phillips; J Parker Goyer; Modupe Akinola; E Tory Higgins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  How do they add up? The interaction between the placebo and treatment effect: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rémy Boussageon; Jeremy Howick; Raphael Baron; Florian Naudet; Bruno Falissard; Ghina Harika-Germaneau; Issa Wassouf; François Gueyffier; Nemat Jaafari; Clara Blanchard
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.716

Review 8.  Methods of blinding in reports of randomized controlled trials assessing pharmacologic treatments: a systematic review.

Authors:  Isabelle Boutron; Candice Estellat; Lydia Guittet; Agnes Dechartres; David L Sackett; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 11.069

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.