Literature DB >> 10204979

Drug-related information generates placebo and nocebo responses that modify the drug response.

M A Flaten1, T Simonsen, H Olsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Administration of the muscle relaxant carisoprodol and placebo was crossed with information that was agonistic or antagonistic to the effect of carisoprodol. It was investigated whether information alone induced physiological and psychological responses, and whether information modified the response to the drug.
METHODS: Half of the subjects received capsules containing 525 mg carisoprodol together with information that the drug acted in a specific way (Groups Relaxant/C, Stimulant/C, and No Information/C). The other half of the subjects received lactose (Groups Relaxant/L, Stimulant/L, and No Information/L). Dependent variables were blink reflexes and skin conductance responses, subjective measures of tension and sleepiness, and serum carisoprodol and meprobamate concentrations. Recordings were made between 15 and 130 minutes after administration of the capsules.
RESULTS: The Stimulant/L group reported more tension compared with the other two groups, and carisoprodol increased tension even more in the Stimulant/C group. The Relaxant/C group displayed higher levels of carisoprodol serum concentration compared with the other groups that received carisoprodol.
CONCLUSIONS: Reported tension was modulated in the direction suggested by the stimulant information. The effect of carisoprodol on tension was also modulated by stimulant information. Increased carisoprodol absorption in the group that received relaxant information could be a mechanism in the placebo response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10204979     DOI: 10.1097/00006842-199903000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychosom Med        ISSN: 0033-3174            Impact factor:   4.312


  52 in total

Review 1.  The placebo effect: advances from different methodological approaches.

Authors:  Karin Meissner; Ulrike Bingel; Luana Colloca; Tor D Wager; Alison Watson; Magne Arve Flaten
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Placebo effect and placebos: what are we talking about? Some conceptual and historical considerations.

Authors:  Ana Macedo; Magí Farré; Josep-E Baños
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-06-27       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Expectations and placebo response: a laboratory investigation into the role of somatic focus.

Authors:  Andrew L Geers; Suzanne G Helfer; Paul E Weiland; Kristin Kosbab
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-12-23

Review 4.  Experimental designs and brain mapping approaches for studying the placebo analgesic effect.

Authors:  Luana Colloca; Fabrizio Benedetti; Carlo Adolfo Porro
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  The effect of stress on absorption of acetaminophen.

Authors:  Magne Arve Flaten; Ole Asli; Terje Simonsen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Differences in adverse effect reporting in placebo groups in SSRI and tricyclic antidepressant trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Winfried Rief; Yvonne Nestoriuc; Anna von Lilienfeld-Toal; Imis Dogan; Franziska Schreiber; Stefan G Hofmann; Arthur J Barsky; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Characterizing the subjective and psychomotor effects of carisoprodol in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  James P Zacny; Judith A Paice; Dennis W Coalson
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  A meta-analytic approach to estimating nocebo effects in neuropathic pain trials.

Authors:  Dimitrios Papadopoulos; Dimos Dimitrios Mitsikostas
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 9.  How placebo responses are formed: a learning perspective.

Authors:  Luana Colloca; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Study design affects participant expectations: a survey.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Scott Alan Rose; Joel R Sneed; Steven P Roose
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.