Literature DB >> 19171781

Differential DNA damage signaling accounts for distinct neural apoptotic responses in ATLD and NBS.

Erin R P Shull1, Youngsoo Lee, Hironobu Nakane, Travis H Stracker, Jingfeng Zhao, Helen R Russell, John H J Petrini, Peter J McKinnon.   

Abstract

The MRN complex (Mre11/RAD50/NBS1) and ATM (ataxia telangiectasia, mutated) are critical for the cellular response to DNA damage. ATM disruption causes ataxia telangiectasia (A-T), while MRN dysfunction can lead to A-T-like disease (ATLD) or Nijmegen breakage syndrome (NBS). Neuropathology is a hallmark of these diseases, whereby neurodegeneration occurs in A-T and ATLD while microcephaly characterizes NBS. To understand the contrasting neuropathology resulting from Mre11 or Nbs1 hypomorphic mutations, we analyzed neural tissue from Mre11(ATLD1/ATLD1) and Nbs1(DeltaB/DeltaB) mice after genotoxic stress. We found a pronounced resistance to DNA damage-induced apoptosis after ionizing radiation or DNA ligase IV (Lig4) loss in the Mre11(ATLD1/ATLD1) nervous system that was associated with defective Atm activation and phosphorylation of its substrates Chk2 and p53. Conversely, DNA damage-induced Atm phosphorylation was defective in Nbs1(DeltaB/DeltaB) neural tissue, although apoptosis occurred normally. We also conditionally disrupted Lig4 throughout the nervous system using Nestin-cre (Lig4(Nes-Cre)), and while viable, these mice showed pronounced microcephaly and a prominent age-related accumulation of DNA damage throughout the brain. Either Atm-/- or Mre11(ATLD1/ATLD1) genetic backgrounds, but not Nbs1(DeltaB/DeltaB), rescued Lig4(Nes-Cre) microcephaly. Thus, DNA damage signaling in the nervous system is different between ATLD and NBS and likely explains their respective neuropathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19171781      PMCID: PMC2648541          DOI: 10.1101/gad.1746609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Dev        ISSN: 0890-9369            Impact factor:   11.361


  62 in total

Review 1.  The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective.

Authors:  B B Zhou; S J Elledge
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-11-23       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  An alternative mode of translation permits production of a variant NBS1 protein from the common Nijmegen breakage syndrome allele.

Authors:  R S Maser; R Zinkel; J H Petrini
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection.

Authors:  Alessandro A Sartori; Claudia Lukas; Julia Coates; Martin Mistrik; Shuang Fu; Jiri Bartek; Richard Baer; Jiri Lukas; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Targeted disruption of the Nijmegen breakage syndrome gene NBS1 leads to early embryonic lethality in mice.

Authors:  J Zhu; S Petersen; L Tessarollo; A Nussenzweig
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-01-23       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Genetic interactions between ATM and the nonhomologous end-joining factors in genomic stability and development.

Authors:  J Sekiguchi; D O Ferguson; H T Chen; E M Yang; J Earle; K Frank; S Whitlow; Y Gu; Y Xu; A Nussenzweig; F W Alt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Targeted disruption of NBS1 reveals its roles in mouse development and DNA repair.

Authors:  Jian Kang; Roderick T Bronson; Yang Xu
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Ataxia telangiectasia mutated-dependent apoptosis after genotoxic stress in the developing nervous system is determined by cellular differentiation status.

Authors:  Y Lee; M J Chong; P J McKinnon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Threonine 68 phosphorylation by ataxia telangiectasia mutated is required for efficient activation of Chk2 in response to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  J Y Ahn; J K Schwarz; H Piwnica-Worms; C E Canman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  DNA repair deficiency and neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Sachin Katyal; Peter J McKinnon
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  Stem cell defects in ATM-deficient undifferentiated spermatogonia through DNA damage-induced cell-cycle arrest.

Authors:  Keiyo Takubo; Masako Ohmura; Masaki Azuma; Go Nagamatsu; Wakako Yamada; Fumio Arai; Atsushi Hirao; Toshio Suda
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 24.633

View more
  52 in total

1.  Nucleolar disruption and apoptosis are distinct neuronal responses to etoposide-induced DNA damage.

Authors:  Maciej Pietrzak; Scott C Smith; Justin T Geralds; Theo Hagg; Cynthia Gomes; Michal Hetman
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 5.372

2.  Genomic profiling of Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in ataxia telangiectasia patients reveals tight link between ATM mutations and chromothripsis.

Authors:  M Ratnaparkhe; M Hlevnjak; T Kolb; A Jauch; K K Maass; F Devens; A Rode; V Hovestadt; A Korshunov; A Pastorczak; W Mlynarski; S Sungalee; J Korbel; J Hoell; U Fischer; T Milde; C Kramm; M Nathrath; K Chrzanowska; E Tausch; M Takagi; T Taga; S Constantini; J Loeffen; J Meijerink; S Zielen; G Gohring; B Schlegelberger; E Maass; R Siebert; J Kunz; A E Kulozik; B Worst; D T Jones; S M Pfister; M Zapatka; P Lichter; A Ernst
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 11.528

3.  3rd International Genome Dynamics in Neuroscience Conference: "DNA repair and neurological disease".

Authors:  Keith W Caldecott; Vilhelm A Bohr; Peter J McKinnon
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 5.432

4.  The Mre11-Nbs1 Interface Is Essential for Viability and Tumor Suppression.

Authors:  Jun Hyun Kim; Malgorzata Grosbart; Roopesh Anand; Claire Wyman; Petr Cejka; John H J Petrini
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 5.  DNA repair mechanisms in dividing and non-dividing cells.

Authors:  Teruaki Iyama; David M Wilson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2013-05-16

6.  PIF1 disruption or NBS1 hypomorphism does not affect chromosome healing or fusion resulting from double-strand breaks near telomeres in murine embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Gloria E Reynolds; Qing Gao; Douglas Miller; Bryan E Snow; Lea A Harrington; John P Murnane
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2011-09-25

7.  Polynucleotide kinase-phosphatase enables neurogenesis via multiple DNA repair pathways to maintain genome stability.

Authors:  Mikio Shimada; Lavinia C Dumitrache; Helen R Russell; Peter J McKinnon
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Double-strand break repair plays a role in repeat instability in a fragile X mouse model.

Authors:  Inbal Gazy; Bruce Hayward; Svetlana Potapova; Xiaonan Zhao; Karen Usdin
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2018-12-21

9.  Progressive cerebellar atrophy and polyneuropathy: expanding the spectrum of PNKP mutations.

Authors:  Cathryn Poulton; Renske Oegema; Daphne Heijsman; Jeannette Hoogeboom; Rachel Schot; Hans Stroink; Michèl A Willemsen; Frans W Verheijen; Peter van de Spek; Andreas Kremer; Grazia M S Mancini
Journal:  Neurogenetics       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 2.660

10.  The genesis of cerebellar interneurons and the prevention of neural DNA damage require XRCC1.

Authors:  Youngsoo Lee; Sachin Katyal; Yang Li; Sherif F El-Khamisy; Helen R Russell; Keith W Caldecott; Peter J McKinnon
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-26       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.