Literature DB >> 15545726

Evolutionary conserved chromosomal segments in the human karyotype are bounded by unstable chromosome bands.

A Ruiz-Herrera1, F García, L Mora, J Egozcue, M Ponsà, M Garcia.   

Abstract

In this paper an ancestral karyotype for primates, defining for the first time the ancestral chromosome morphology and the banding patterns, is proposed, and the ancestral syntenic chromosomal segments are identified in the human karyotype. The chromosomal bands that are boundaries of ancestral segments are identified. We have analyzed from data published in the literature 35 different primate species from 19 genera, using the order Scandentia, as well as other published mammalian species as out-groups, and propose an ancestral chromosome number of 2n = 54 for primates, which includes the following chromosomal forms: 1(a+c(1)), 1(b+c(2)), 2a, 2b, 3/21, 4, 5, 6, 7a, 7b, 8, 9, 10a, 10b, 11, 12a/22a, 12b/22b, 13, 14/15, 16a, 16b, 17, 18, 19a, 19b, 20 and X and Y. From this analysis, we have been able to point out the human chromosome bands more "prone" to breakage during the evolutionary pathways and/or pathology processes. We have observed that 89.09% of the human chromosome bands, which are boundaries for ancestral chromosome segments, contain common fragile sites and/or intrachromosomal telomeric-like sequences. A more in depth analysis of twelve different human chromosomes has allowed us to determine that 62.16% of the chromosomal bands implicated in inversions and 100% involved in fusions/fissions correspond to fragile sites, intrachromosomal telomeric-like sequences and/or bands significantly affected by X irradiation. In addition, 73% of the bands affected in pathological processes are co-localized in bands where fragile sites, intrachromosomal telomeric-like sequences, bands significantly affected by X irradiation and/or evolutionary chromosomal bands have been described. Our data also support the hypothesis that chromosomal breakages detected in pathological processes are not randomly distributed along the chromosomes, but rather concentrate in those important evolutionary chromosome bands which correspond to fragile sites and/or intrachromosomal telomeric-like sequences. Copyright (c) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15545726     DOI: 10.1159/000080812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res        ISSN: 1424-8581            Impact factor:   1.636


  15 in total

1.  Synteny of human chromosomes 14 and 15 in the platyrrhines (Primates, Platyrrhini).

Authors:  Cristiani Gifalli-Iughetti; Célia P Koiffmann
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 1.771

Review 2.  Making a long story short: noncoding RNAs and chromosome change.

Authors:  J D Brown; S E Mitchell; R J O'Neill
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Rapid, independent, and extensive amplification of telomeric repeats in pericentromeric regions in karyotypes of arvicoline rodents.

Authors:  M Th Rovatsos; J A Marchal; I Romero-Fernández; F J Fernández; E B Giagia-Athanosopoulou; Antonio Sánchez
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Chromosome territory positioning of conserved homologous chromosomes in different primate species.

Authors:  Laia Mora; Inma Sánchez; Montserrat Garcia; Montserrat Ponsà
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Are molecular cytogenetics and bioinformatics suggesting diverging models of ancestral mammalian genomes?

Authors:  Lutz Froenicke; Montserrat Garcia Caldés; Alexander Graphodatsky; Stefan Müller; Leslie A Lyons; Terence J Robinson; Marianne Volleth; Fengtang Yang; Johannes Wienberg
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Hemiplasy and homoplasy in the karyotypic phylogenies of mammals.

Authors:  Terence J Robinson; Aurora Ruiz-Herrera; John C Avise
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Anchoring the dog to its relatives reveals new evolutionary breakpoints across 11 species of the Canidae and provides new clues for the role of B chromosomes.

Authors:  Shannon E Duke Becker; Rachael Thomas; Vladimir A Trifonov; Robert K Wayne; Alexander S Graphodatsky; Matthew Breen
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 5.239

8.  Molecular characterisation of the pericentric inversion that distinguishes human chromosome 5 from the homologous chimpanzee chromosome.

Authors:  Justyna M Szamalek; Violaine Goidts; Nadia Chuzhanova; Horst Hameister; David N Cooper; Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Conservation of aphidicolin-induced fragile sites in Papionini (Primates) species and humans.

Authors:  Aurora Ruiz-Herrera; Francisca Garcia; Lutz Frönicke; Montserrat Ponsà; Josep Egozcue; Montserrat Garcia Caldés; Roscoe Stanyon
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 10.  Molecular mechanisms of chromosomal rearrangement during primate evolution.

Authors:  Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki; David N Cooper
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.