Literature DB >> 15541525

On the nature of phase attraction in sensorimotor synchronization with interleaved auditory sequences.

Bruno H Repp1.   

Abstract

In a task that requires in-phase synchronization of finger taps with an isochronous sequence of target tones that is interleaved with a sequence of distractor tones at various fixed phase relationships, the taps tend to be attracted to the distractor tones, especially when the distractor tones closely precede the target tones [Repp, B. H. (2003a). Phase attraction in sensorimotor synchronization with auditory sequences: Effects of single and periodic distractors on synchronization accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 290-309]. The present research addressed two related questions about this distractor effect: (1) Is it a function of the absolute temporal separation or of the relative phase of the two stimulus sequences? (2) Is it the result of perceptual grouping (integration) of target and distractor tones or of simultaneous attraction to two independent sequences? In three experiments, distractor effects were compared across two different sequence rates. The results suggest that absolute temporal separation, not relative phase, is the critical variable. Experiment 3 also included an anti-phase tapping task that addressed the second question directly. The results suggest that the attraction of taps to distractor tones is caused mainly by temporal integration of target and distractor tones within a fixed window of 100-150 ms duration, with the earlier-occurring tone being weighted more strongly than the later-occurring one.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15541525     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2004.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  13 in total

1.  Synchronization with competing visual and auditory rhythms: bouncing ball meets metronome.

Authors:  Michael J Hove; John R Iversen; Allen Zhang; Bruno H Repp
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-05-26

Review 2.  Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of the tapping literature.

Authors:  Bruno H Repp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

3.  Temporal evolution of the phase correction response in synchronization of taps with perturbed two-interval rhythms.

Authors:  Bruno H Repp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Flexibility of temporal expectations for triple subdivision of a beat.

Authors:  Bruno H Repp; Haitham Jendoubi
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-04-27

5.  Music and speech distractors disrupt sensorimotor synchronization: effects of musical training.

Authors:  Anita Białuńska; Simone Dalla Bella
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Moments in time.

Authors:  Marc Wittmann
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-18

7.  Beat Synchronization across the Lifespan: Intersection of Development and Musical Experience.

Authors:  Elaine C Thompson; Travis White-Schwoch; Adam Tierney; Nina Kraus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Why movement is captured by music, but less by speech: role of temporal regularity.

Authors:  Simone Dalla Bella; Anita Białuńska; Jakub Sowiński
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Paired Synchronous Rhythmic Finger Tapping without an External Timing Cue Shows Greater Speed Increases Relative to Those for Solo Tapping.

Authors:  Masahiro Okano; Masahiro Shinya; Kazutoshi Kudo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Thresholds of auditory-motor coupling measured with a simple task in musicians and non-musicians: was the sound simultaneous to the key press?

Authors:  Floris T van Vugt; Barbara Tillmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.