Literature DB >> 15540501

Transfer to intermediate forms following concept discrimination by pigeons: chimeras and morphs.

Natasha Ghosh1, Stephen E G Lea, Malia Noury.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined pigeons' generalization to intermediate forms following training of concept discriminations. In Experiment 1, the training stimuli were sets of images of dogs and cats, and the transfer stimuli were head/body chimeras, which humans tend to categorize more readily in terms of the head part rather than the body part. In Experiment 2, the training stimuli were sets of images of heads of dogs and cats, and the intermediate stimuli were computer-generated morphs. In both experiments, pigeons learned the concept discrimination quickly and generalized with some decrement to novel instances of the categories. In both experiments, transfer tests were carried out with intermediate forms generated from both familiar and novel exemplars of the training sets. In Experiment 1, the pigeons' transfer performance, unlike that of human infants exposed to similar stimuli, was best predicted by the body part of the stimulus when the chimeras were formed from familiar exemplars. Spatial frequency analysis of the stimuli showed that the body parts were richer in high spatial frequencies than the head parts, so these data are consistent with the hypothesis that categorization is more dependent on local stimulus features in pigeons than in humans. There was no corresponding trend when the chimeras were formed from novel exemplars. In Experiment 2, when morphs of training stimuli were used, response rates declined smoothly as the proportion of the morph contributed by the positive stimulus fell, although results with morphs of novel stimuli were again less orderly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15540501      PMCID: PMC1285001          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2004.82-125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  15 in total

1.  Dynamic shifts of pigeon local/global attention.

Authors:  Thane Fremouw; Walter T Herbranson; Charles P Shimp
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2002-10-08       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Global-feature classification can be acquired more rapidly than local-feature classification in both humans and pigeons.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Goto; A J Wills; Stephen E G Lea
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2003-10-11       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Priming of attention to local or global levels of visual analysis.

Authors:  T Fremouw; W T Herbranson; C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1998-07

4.  Face preference at birth.

Authors:  E Valenza; F Simion; V M Cassia; C Umiltà
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Pigeons learn the concept of an "A".

Authors:  M J Morgan; M D Fitch; J G Holman; E G Lea
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells.

Authors:  D J Field
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings.

Authors:  F W Campbell; J G Robson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  The pigeon's recognition of drawings of depth-rotated stimuli.

Authors:  E A Wasserman; J L Gagliardi; B R Cook; K Kirkpatrick-Steger; S L Astley; I Biederman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1996-04

9.  Perceptual cues that permit categorical differentiation of animal species by infants.

Authors:  P C Quinn; P D Eimas
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1996-10

10.  Evidence for representations of perceptually similar natural categories by 3-month-old and 4-month-old infants.

Authors:  P C Quinn; P D Eimas; S L Rosenkrantz
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  5 in total

1.  Dominant vertical orientation processing without clustered maps: early visual brain dynamics imaged with voltage-sensitive dye in the pigeon visual Wulst.

Authors:  Benedict Shien Wei Ng; Agnieszka Grabska-Barwińska; Onur Güntürkün; Dirk Jancke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Domestic pigeons (Columba livia) discriminate between photographs of male and female pigeons.

Authors:  Tamo Nakamura; Masato Ito; David B Croft; R Frederick Westbrook
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Pigeons use high spatial frequencies when memorizing pictures.

Authors:  Matthew S Murphy; Daniel I Brooks; Robert G Cook
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 2.478

4.  Categorization of birds, mammals, and chimeras by pigeons.

Authors:  Robert G Cook; Anthony A Wright; Eric E Drachman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Pigeons show how meta-control enables decision-making in an ambiguous world.

Authors:  Martina Manns; Tobias Otto; Laurenz Salm
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.