Literature DB >> 27000912

A novel method of bladder neck imbrication to improve early urinary continence following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

K Beattie1, J Symons1,2, S Chopra1, C Yuen2,3, R Savdie1,2, R Thanigasalam1,2, A M Haynes1, J Matthews2, P C Brenner2,3,4, K Rasiah1,5, R L Sutherland1, P D Stricker6,7,8.   

Abstract

Early return of continence forms an important component of quality of life for patients after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP). Here we describe the steps of bladder neck imbrication and vesico-urethral anastomosis improving early continence after RALP. Between April 2008 and July 2009, 202 consecutive patients underwent RALP for clinically localised prostate cancer in a tertiary referral centre by a single surgeon. One hundred and thirty-two (65 %) of these patients agreed to participate in the study. Prior to November 2008, 51 patients underwent standard RALP as described by Patel et al. From November 2008, 81 patients underwent a novel method of bladder neck imbrication. The robotic urethro-vesical anastomosis commences on the posterior wall of the urethra and proceeds anteriorly. In our technique the anastomosis is halted with the suture arms fixed to the anterior abdominal wall. A new suture is used to perform a two-layer repair, anchoring proximally then continuing anteriorly to the level of the urethral stump, where it returns upon itself. The aim is to narrow the urethra to 16 Fr and tighten the second layer to create an imbrication effect. Posterior reconstruction was performed in all patients. Outcome measures were recorded prospectively using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite tool. Our technique shows significant improvement at all stages of follow-up in urinary summary and incontinence scores. Absolute continence rates increased from 8.2 to 20.5 %, 26.7 to 44.3 %, and 47.7 to 62.3 % at 1.5, 3 and 6 months, respectively. These results support the use of our technique in patients undergoing RALP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder neck anastomosis; Continence; Localised prostate cancer; Minimally invasive surgery; Radical prostatectomy; Robotic surgery

Year:  2012        PMID: 27000912     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-012-0371-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  27 in total

Review 1.  Factors predicting early return of continence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jaspreet S Sandhu; James A Eastham
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Posterior reconstruction before vesicourethral anastomosis in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy leads to earlier return to baseline continence.

Authors:  James C Brien; Bethany Barone; Michael Fabrizio; Robert Given
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Accuracy of recall in health-related quality-of-life assessment among men treated for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M S Litwin; K A McGuigan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Intussusception of the bladder neck does not promote early restoration to urinary continence after non-nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Iori Sakai; Ken-Ichi Harada; Isao Hara; Hiroshi Eto; Hideaki Miyake
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.369

5.  Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  J T Wei; R L Dunn; M S Litwin; H M Sandler; M G Sanda
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-12-20       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Minimising postoperative incontinence following radical prostatectomy: considerations and evidence.

Authors:  Angelo J Cambio; Christopher P Evans
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  F Rocco; L Carmignani; P Acquati; F Gadda; P Dell'Orto; B Rocco; G Bozzini; G Gazzano; A Morabito
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Bladder neck-sparing modification of radical prostatectomy adversely affects surgical margins in pathologic T3a prostate cancer.

Authors:  R Marcovich; K J Wojno; J T Wei; M A Rubin; J E Montie; M G Sanda
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Radical prostatectomy with preservation of urinary continence: pathology and long-term results.

Authors:  Douglas L Gaker; Barbara L Steel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a review of current outcomes.

Authors:  Rafael F Coelho; Sanket Chauhan; Kenneth J Palmer; Bernardo Rocco; Manoj B Patel; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.