Literature DB >> 15536535

An osteoporosis screening tool for Chinese men.

H S Lynn1, E M C Lau, S Y S Wong, A W L Hong.   

Abstract

Several osteoporosis risk instruments have been proposed to select women for bone densitometry, but no validated instruments are currently available for men. This study aims to address this deficiency by developing and validating a Male Osteoporosis Screening Tool (MOST) for Chinese men. Two thousand ambulatory men, aged 65 and above, were recruited from the general community in Hong Kong, and a cohort of 1,970 men with valid total hip and lumbar spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements was included in the current analysis. A 60% random sample was selected as the training sample for developing the screening tool, and the remaining 40% constituted the validation sample. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used to identify the simplest combination of risk factors to be included in the screening tool for predicting osteoporosis at the femoral neck, total hip, or lumbar spine. Body weight and quantitative ultrasound index (QUI) were found to contribute significantly to the area under the ROC curve (AUC), yielding an AUC of 0.823 in the training sample. The resulting MOST had a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 46% when using a cutoff score of 3. MOST had an AUC of 0.839 in the validation sample. The risk of osteoporosis was 1% among those with MOST scores < or = 2, but 72% among those with MOST scores > 7. Using a cutoff of 3, the negative predictive value was 97.5% which suggests that the 42% with MOST scores < or = 3 may be accurately screened out as being without osteoporosis, thus saving two fifths of our DXA resources. The positive predictive value was 72% when using a cutoff of 7, implying that MOST cannot replace DXA for case-finding purposes. Nevertheless, for resource allocation and patient satisfaction, it is prudent and economical to offer DXA screening first to the 6% with MOST scores > 7.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15536535     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-004-1768-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  26 in total

1.  Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease.

Authors:  J A Kanis; P Delmas; P Burckhardt; C Cooper; D Torgerson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Stiffness in discrimination of patients with vertebral fractures.

Authors:  M B Mikhail; E Flaster; J F Aloia
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Estimation of the prevalence of low bone density in Canadian women and men using a population-specific DXA reference standard: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos).

Authors:  A Tenenhouse; L Joseph; N Kreiger; S Poliquin; T M Murray; L Blondeau; C Berger; D A Hanley; J C Prior
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Stiffness index identifies patients with osteoporotic fractures better than ultrasound velocity or attenuation alone.

Authors:  P Hadji; O Hars; C Wüster; K Bock; U S Alberts; H G Bohnet; G Emons; K D Schulz
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound?

Authors:  M L Frost; G M Blake; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Incidence and direct medical costs of hospitalizations due to osteoporotic fractures in Switzerland.

Authors:  K Lippuner; J von Overbeck; R Perrelet; H Bosshard; P Jaeger
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Performance of the Osteoporosis Self-assessment Screening Tool for osteoporosis in American men.

Authors:  Robert A Adler; Mongthuong T Tran; Valentina I Petkov
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 8.  Osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  Jant M Campion; Michael J Maricic
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 3.292

9.  Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection.

Authors:  C Cooper; G Campion; L J Melton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Perspective. How many women have osteoporosis?

Authors:  L J Melton; E A Chrischilles; C Cooper; A W Lane; B L Riggs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology and pathophysiology of osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  Robert A Adler
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Predictive values of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and dual energy X ray absorptiometry for non-vertebral fracture in older men: results from the MrOS study (Hong Kong).

Authors:  T Kwok; C C Khoo; J Leung; A Kwok; L Qin; J Woo; P C Leung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  An evaluation of osteoporosis screening tools for the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study.

Authors:  H S Lynn; J Woo; P C Leung; E L Barrett-Connor; M C Nevitt; J A Cauley; R A Adler; E S Orwoll
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Risk factors for low BMD in healthy men age 50 years or older: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Papaioannou; C C Kennedy; A Cranney; G Hawker; J P Brown; S M Kaiser; W D Leslie; C J M O'Brien; A M Sawka; A Khan; K Siminoski; G Tarulli; D Webster; J McGowan; J D Adachi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Evaluation of the Predictive Index for Osteoporosis as a Clinical Tool to Identify the Risk of Osteoporosis in Korean Men by Using the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Moon; Lee Oh Kim; Hyeon Ju Kim; Mi Hee Kong
Journal:  Korean J Fam Med       Date:  2016-11-18

6.  Development and Validation of Osteoporosis Risk-Assessment Model for Korean Men.

Authors:  Sun Min Oh; Bo Mi Song; Byung Ho Nam; Yumie Rhee; Seong Hwan Moon; Deog Young Kim; Dae Ryong Kang; Hyeon Chang Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.759

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.