Literature DB >> 10367026

Stiffness in discrimination of patients with vertebral fractures.

M B Mikhail1, E Flaster, J F Aloia.   

Abstract

We measured the ultrasound parameters of the heels of 49 women with vertebral fractures and 87 age-matched controls using an Achilles ultrasound device. Average broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), speed of sound (SOS) and Stiffness were significantly lower in fracture patients (p < 0.0001). We also estimated the ultrasound parameters of patients compared with age-matched non-fracture controls and found the mean BUA to be -1.02 SD below control values. The mean SOS was -0.97 SD and the mean Stiffness was -1.12 SD below control values. Femoral bone mineral density (BMD) at the neck, Ward's triangle and the trochanter, the total-body BMD and L2-4 BMD were measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and found to be significantly lower in fracture patients (p < 0.0001). All correlation coefficients between ultrasound parameters and DXA measurements were > 0.5 and statistically significant (p < 0.0001). A stepwise logistic regression with presence or absence of vertebral fracture as the response variable and all ultrasound--DXA parameters as the explanatory variables indicated that the best predictor of fracture was Stiffness, with additional predictive ability provided by spine BMD. Sensitivity and specificity of all measures were determined by the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, which were 0.76 +/- 0.04 for BUA, 0.77 +/- 0.04 for SOS, 0.78 +/- 0.04 for Stiffness and 0.78 +/- 0.03 for spine BMD. The areas under the ROC curves of BUA, SOS, Stiffness and spine BMD were compared and it was found that Stiffness and spine BMD were significantly better predictors of fracture than BUA and SOS. These results support many recent studies showing that ultrasound measurements of the os-calcis have diagnostic sensitivity comparable to DXA, and also demonstrated that Stiffness was a better predictor of fracture than spine BMD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10367026     DOI: 10.1007/s001980050112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  9 in total

1.  Reference data for quantitative ultrasound values of calcaneus in 2927 healthy Chinese men.

Authors:  Zi-Qiang Zhu; Wei Liu; Cheng-Li Xu; Shao-Mei Han; Shu-Yu Zu; Guang-Jin Zhu
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Quantitative ultrasound and radiographic absorptiometry are associated with vertebral deformity in Japanese Women: the Hizen-Oshima study.

Authors:  Y Abe; N Takamura; Z Ye; M Tomita; M Osaki; Y Kusano; T Nakamura; K Aoyagi; S Honda
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Lifestyle factors affecting heel ultrasound in Greek females across different life stages.

Authors:  Eirini Babaroutsi; Faidon Magkos; Yannis Manios; Labros S Sidossis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  An osteoporosis screening tool for Chinese men.

Authors:  H S Lynn; E M C Lau; S Y S Wong; A W L Hong
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) in the Management of Osteoporosis and Assessment of Fracture Risk: An Update.

Authors:  Didier Hans; Antoine Métrailler; Elena Gonzalez Rodriguez; Olivier Lamy; Enisa Shevroja
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  The effect of age, weight, and lifestyle factors on calcaneal quantitative ultrasound: the ESOPO study.

Authors:  Silvano Adami; Sandro Giannini; Ruben Giorgino; GianCarlo Isaia; Stefania Maggi; Luigi Sinigaglia; Paolo Filipponi; Gaetano Crepaldi; Ombretta Di Munno
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density: discriminatory ability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and controls with and without vertebral deformities.

Authors:  R E Ørstavik; G Haugeberg; T Uhlig; P Mowinckel; T K Kvien; J A Falch; J I Halse
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  A Cross-Sectional Study of the Association between Autoantibodies and Qualitative Ultrasound Index of Bone in an Elderly Sample without Clinical Autoimmune Disease.

Authors:  Rosebella A Iseme; Mark McEvoy; Brian Kelly; Linda Agnew; Frederick R Walker; Michael Boyle; John Attia
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.818

9.  TDF and quantitative ultrasound bone quality in African patients on second line ART, ANRS 12169 2LADY sub-study.

Authors:  Firmin Nongodo Kabore; Sabrina Eymard-Duvernay; Jacques Zoungrana; Stéphanie Badiou; Guillaume Bado; Arsène Héma; Assane Diouf; Eric Delaporte; Sinata Koulla-Shiro; Laura Ciaffi; Amandine Cournil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.