| Literature DB >> 15535844 |
Danielle M Friedrichsen1, Kathleen E Malone, David R Doody, Janet R Daling, Elaine A Ostrander.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The cell-cycle checkpoint kinase (CHEK)2 protein truncating mutation 1100delC has been associated with increased risk for breast or prostate cancer. Multiple studies have found an elevated frequency of the 1100delC variant in specific stratifications of breast cancer patients with a family history of the disease, including BRCA1/BRCA2 negative families and families with a history of bilateral disease or male breast cancer. However, the 1100delC mutation has only been investigated in a few population-based studies and none from North America.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15535844 PMCID: PMC1064080 DOI: 10.1186/bcr933
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breast Cancer Res ISSN: 1465-5411 Impact factor: 6.466
Characteristics of cases and controls
| Characteristic | Cases ( | Controls ( | ||
| % | % | |||
| Age at reference (years) | ||||
| < 35 | 62 | 12.3 | 80 | 17.4 |
| 35+ | 444 | 87.7 | 379 | 82.6 |
| Race | ||||
| White | 450 | 88.9 | 412 | 89.8 |
| Nonwhite | 56 | 11.1 | 47 | 10.2 |
| Family history | ||||
| None | 280 | 56.7 | 294 | 66.1 |
| First degree | 94 | 19.0 | 36 | 8.1 |
| Second degree | 120 | 24.3 | 115 | 25.8 |
| Unknown | 12 | 14 | ||
| Menopausal status | ||||
| Premenopausal | 445 | 88.3 | 392 | 85.8 |
| Postmenopausal | 59 | 11.7 | 65 | 14.2 |
| Unknown | 2 | 2 | ||
Association of CHEK2 variants with breast cancer risk
| Cases ( | Controls ( | ORb | 95% CI | |||
| % | % | |||||
| 1100del C | ||||||
| Noncarrier | 499 | 98.8 | 456 | 99.6 | 1.0 | Reference |
| Carrier | 6 | 1.2 | 2 | 0.4 | 2.9 | (0.6–14.6) |
| R145W | ||||||
| Noncarrier | 505 | 99.8 | 459 | 100.0 | 1.0 | Reference |
| Carrier | 1 | 0.2 | 0 | - | - | - |
| I175T | ||||||
| Noncarrier | 504 | 99.6 | 455 | 99.1 | 1.0 | Reference |
| Carrier | 2 | 0.4 | 4 | 0.9 | 0.5 | (0.1–2.6) |
aAll carriers are heterozygous. bAdjusted for age at reference and reference year. CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
Frequency of CHEK2 variants in cases and controls according to age and family history features
| All women | 1100delC+ | I175T+ | ||||||||||||
| Cases | Controls | Cases | Controls | Cases | Controls | |||||||||
| % | 95% CI | n | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | ||||||
| Age (years) | ||||||||||||||
| < 30 | 10 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| 30–34 | 52 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.6 | 0.04–8.4 | ||||||
| 35–39 | 156 | 140 | 1 | 0.6 | 0.02–3.5 | 1 | 0.7 | 0.02–3.9 | 1 | 0.6 | 0.02–3.5 | 0 | ||
| 40–44 | 288 | 239 | 5 | 1.7 | 0.6–4.0 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.01–2.3 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.009–1.9 | 3 | 1.3 | 0.3–3.6 |
| Family History of breast cancera | ||||||||||||||
| None | 280 | 294 | 2 | 0.7 | 0.09–2.6 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.009–1.9 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.009–2.0 | 3 | 1.0 | 0.2–3.0 |
| First-degree | 94 | 36 | 4 | 4.3 | 1.2–10.5 | 0 | 1 | 1.1 | 0.03–5.8 | 0 | ||||
| Second-degree only | 120 | 115 | 0 | 1 | 0.9 | 0.02–4.7 | 0 | 1 | 0.9 | 0.02–4.7 | ||||
| Number of relatives with breast cancera | ||||||||||||||
| None | 280 | 294 | 2 | 0.7 | 0.09–2.6 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.009–1.9 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.009–2.0 | 3 | 1.0 | 0.2–3.0 |
| 1 | 137 | 114 | 3 | 2.2 | 0.5–6.3 | 1 | 0.9 | 0.02–4.8 | 1 | 0.7 | 0.02–4.0 | 0 | ||
| 2 | 51 | 29 | 1 | 2.0 | 0.05–10.4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3.4 | 0.09–17.8 | ||||
| 3+ | 26 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| Family history of ovarian cancer | ||||||||||||||
| None | 461 | 432 | 4 | 0.9 | 0.2–2.2 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.06–1.7 | 2 | 0.4 | 0.05–1.6 | 4 | 0.9 | 0.3–2.4 |
| 1st or 2nd degree | 45 | 27 | 2 | 4.4 | 0.5–15.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Family history of breast and/or ovarian cancera | ||||||||||||||
| No breast/no ovarian | 258 | 278 | 2 | 0.8 | 0.09–2.8 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.009–2.0 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.01–2.1 | 3 | 1.1 | 0.2–3.1 |
| No breast/yes ovarian | 22 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| Yes breast/no ovarian | 192 | 141 | 2 | 1.0 | 0.1–3.7 | 1 | 0.7 | 0.02–3.9 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.01–2.9 | 1 | 0.7 | 0.02–3.9 |
| Yes breast/yes ovarian | 22 | 10 | 2 | 9.1 | 1.1–29.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
aTwelve cases and 14 controls had missing information on their family history and are excluded. There were no CHEK2 variants in these women.