Literature DB >> 12529183

Frequency of CHEK2*1100delC in New York breast cancer cases and controls.

Kenneth Offit1, Heather Pierce, Tomas Kirchhoff, Prema Kolachana, Beth Rapaport, Peter Gregersen, Steven Johnson, Orit Yossepowitch, Helen Huang, Jaya Satagopan, Mark Robson, Lauren Scheuer, Khedoudja Nafa, Nathan Ellis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 1100delC CHEK2 allele has been associated with a 1.4-4.7 fold increased risk for breast cancer in women carrying this mutation. While the frequency of 1100delC was 1.1-1.4% in healthy Finnish controls, the frequency of this allele in a North American control population and in North American breast cancer kindreds remains unclear.
METHODS: We genotyped 1665 healthy New York volunteers and 300 cases of breast cancer for the CHEK2*1100delC.
RESULTS: The overall frequency of the 1100delC was 3/300 (1.0%) among all cases with either a family history of breast cancer (n = 192) or a personal history of breast cancer (n = 108, of which 46 were bilateral, 46 unilateral, and 16 were male breast cancer cases), compared to a frequency of 5/1665 (0.3%) in healthy controls (p = 0.1). There was no difference in allele frequency among Ashkenazi and non-Ashkenazi controls.
CONCLUSION: The relatively low breast cancer penetrance of this allele, along with the low population frequency, will limit the clinical applicability of germline testing for CHEK2*1100delC in North American kindreds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12529183      PMCID: PMC149355          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-4-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Genet        ISSN: 1471-2350            Impact factor:   2.103


Background

In response to DNA damage, the cell-cycle checkpoint kinase CHEK2 can be activated by ATM kinase to phosphorylate p53 and BRCA1, which are involved in cell-cycle control, apoptosis, and DNA repair [1,2]. A germline mutation 1100delC truncates the CHEK2 protein and was first observed in families exhibiting Li-Fraumeni syndrome [3]. To address the possibility that this allele contributes to increased susceptibility to breast cancer, two recent studies have investigated the frequency of CHEK2*1100delC in cancer cases and controls. Vahteristo et al. [4] reported that the 1100delC protein-truncating mutation of CHEK2 was observed in 5.5% of 507 patients with a family history of breast cancer and no detectable BRCA mutation compared to 1.4% of 1,885 healthy Finnish controls. The CHEK2-Breast Cancer Consortium observed a 5.1% frequency of this allele in 1071 individuals with breast cancer derived from multiple-case families in which no mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 were detected, compared to a 1.1% of 1,620 healthy (mostly Northern European) controls [5]. These two groups also reported an increased frequency of CHEK2*1100delC in kindreds with male breast cancer or bilateral breast cancer. We report here the frequency of CHEK2*1100delC in North American breast cancer patients and controls.

Methods

We have analyzed a North American sample of healthy controls participating in the New York Cancer Project, and two series of cases: those enrolled in a genetic counseling clinic as well as a separate series of cases unselected for family history ascertained at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. The cases and controls self-identified themselves as Jewish or non-Jewish and reported their ancestor's countries of origin. The population control samples were derived from the New York Cancer Project, an ongoing cohort study enrolling healthy volunteers. Of the 569 non-Ashkenazi controls participating in this study, 62 were African-American, 37 Hispanic, 20 Asian, 18 Other/Unknown, and 432 Caucasian. All individuals in this study provided informed consent for future DNA analysis. Genomic DNA was extracted and amplified utilizing CHEK2 external PCR primers: 9Fe 5' CTGTCATCTCAAGAAGAGGACT and 10R 5' ATTTGTGACTTCATCTAATCACCTCC and internal PCR primers: 9F 5' TGGCAAGTTCAACATTATTCCC and 10Re 5' GAATAACTCCTAAACTCCAGC Genotyping was performed by dHPLC (Transgenomics, USA) or Pyrosequencing (Pyrosequencing, Inc. Sweden); all mutations were confirmed by both of these methodologies. Non-Ashkenazi individuals were screened by DNA sequencing for mutations in the entire BRCA1 and BRCA2 coding sequence and Ashkenazi individuals were screened for the three founder alleles that account for >95% of mutations in this ethnic group [6].

Results

We observed CHEK2*1100delC in 5/1665 (0.3%) of healthy New York City controls, significantly lower than the frequency in controls reported by Vahteristo et al. (p = 0.0004, Fisher's Exact test) or by the CHEK2 Consortium (p = 0.006). Within our sample, 3/1096 (0.3%) individuals of Jewish (predominantly Ashkenazi) descent carried this allele, a rate comparable to the 0.4% frequency (2/569) observed in individuals of non-Ashkenazi descent. We detected CHEK2*1100delC in 1/100 index cases from multiple-case breast cancer families in which mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 were not detected. As noted in Table 1, the one case heterozygous for the 1100delC was an individual of Ashkenazi descent seen at our Center who was previously included in the report by the CHEK2-Breast Cancer Consortium. Of these 100 families, 33 were of Ashkenazi descent and 67 were of non-Ashkenazi origin. CHEK2*1100delC was detected in 0/16 male individuals with breast cancer without mutations in BRCA2, and in 1/46 (2.2%) of clinic-ascertained bilateral breast cancer cases in individuals with a family history of breast cancer who were also of Ashkenazi Jewish descent compared to 0/46 clinic-ascertained unilateral breast cancer cases matched by age, ethnicity and family history. In a separate series of bilateral breast cancer cases unselected for family history, 0/46 carried CHEK2*1100delC, compared to 1/46 unilateral breast cancer cases matched to the bilateral cases by age and ethnicity. Taking all of the breast cancer cases combined, the frequency of the 1100delC was 3/300 (1.0%) compared to the population frequency of 5/1665 (0.3%) (p = 0.10).
Table 1

CHEK2*1100delC in breast cancer cases and healthy controls

Positive for CHEK2*1100delC (%)
Controls
Jewish (New York)3/1096 (0.3%)
Non-Jewish (New York)2/569 (0.4%)
Total5/1665 (0.3%)
BRCA1/2-negative individuals of mixed ethnicity with breast cancer from families with 3 or more cases of breast cancer0/67 (0.0%)
BRCA1/2 Ashkenazi founder mutation-negative individuals with breast cancer from families with 3 or more cases of breast cancer1/33# (3.0%)
BRCA2-negativei individuals of mixed ethnicity with male breast cancer0/16 (0.0%)
Individuals with bilateral breast cancer of mixed ethnicity unselected for family history0/46 (0.0%)
Individuals with unilateral breast cancer unselected for family history matched for age, ethnicity1/46 (2.2%)
Clinic-ascertained individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent with bilateral breast cancer1/46 (2.2%)
Clinic-ascertained individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent with unilateral breast cancer matched for age, family history0/46 (0.0%)

#This case previously reported in CHEK2 Breast Cancer Consortium [5].

CHEK2*1100delC in breast cancer cases and healthy controls #This case previously reported in CHEK2 Breast Cancer Consortium [5].

Discussion

Our current findings do not exclude the possibility that the CHEK2*1100delC variant increases the relative risk for breast cancer in North Americans. Because this variant occurs significantly less commonly in healthy New York controls compared to Northern European controls, the low frequency of this allele in multiple-case families, bilateral cases, and male breast cancer cases could still be compatible with a relative risk in the range of 3.5–12 as reported by Vahteristo et al. and the CHEK2-Breast Cancer Consortium. A prior attempt to analyze the entire CHEK2 gene in a northern European cohort was unable to detect mutations in exons 10–14, including the 1100delC, in 79 BRCA1/2-negative individuals from Finnish families with three or more cases of breast cancer [7]. The relative size of the population control samples in our studies was comparable to prior studies (1,620 population controls in the CHEK2-Consortium, 1,885 in Vahteristo et al, and 1,665 in the current study). We evaluated 100 BRCA mutation-negative breast cancer families, compared to 216 in the report by Vahteristo et al, and 718 in the Consortium study. However, our report also utilized the hypothesis proposed by Begg et al [8], of an "enrichment" of germline carriers of cancer predisposition alleles in individuals with bilateral breast cancer. Our series analyzed 92 cases of bilateral breast cancer and 92 controls, compared to 33 bilateral breast cancer cases included in the report by Vahteristo et al. While no enrichment was noted in our bilateral cases compared to unilateral cases, this may also reflect the lower population frequency of the allele in our population. Further study of the frequency of the CHEK2*1100delC allele in North American breast cancer kindreds is warranted, however, the relative rarity of this allele in our population, plus the relatively low breast cancer penetrance reported for this allele, limit the clinical relevance in North American kindreds of CHEK2*1100delC as a cancer-predisposing allele.

Conclusions

The 0.3% frequency of the 1100delC CHEK2 allele in a New York population is significantly lower than the 1.1–1.4% rate observed in Northern European populations. This allele was infrequent in BRCA1/2 wild-type cases with family history of breast cancer or in cases with a personal history of unilateral or bilateral of breast cancer. The relatively low breast cancer penetrance, along with the low population frequency, limit the clinical relevance in North American kindreds of CHEK2*1100delC as a cancer predisposing allele.

Competing interests

None declared.

Authors' contributions

KO designed the study and wrote the final draft of the paper; HP helped in the design and coordinated specimen collection; TK, KN, and PK performed genotype analysis and wre supervised by NE who also participated in study design; BR wrote the first draft of the manuscript and coordinated data collection; PK and SG oversaw collection of control samples and participated in study design; OY ascertained the familial breast cases and helped with study design; HH helped with data collection and analysis, JS provided biostatistical analysis; MR and LS participated in study design and analysis.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:
  8 in total

1.  hCds1-mediated phosphorylation of BRCA1 regulates the DNA damage response.

Authors:  J S Lee; K M Collins; A L Brown; C H Lee; J H Chung
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-03-09       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Incidence of non-founder BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in high risk Ashkenazi breast and ovarian cancer families.

Authors:  N D Kauff; P Perez-Segura; M E Robson; L Scheuer; B Siegel; A Schluger; B Rapaport; T S Frank; K Nafa; N A Ellis; G Parmigiani; K Offit
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  A CHEK2 genetic variant contributing to a substantial fraction of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Pia Vahteristo; Jirina Bartkova; Hannaleena Eerola; Kirsi Syrjäkoski; Salla Ojala; Outi Kilpivaara; Anitta Tamminen; Juha Kononen; Kristiina Aittomäki; Päivi Heikkilä; Kaija Holli; Carl Blomqvist; Jiri Bartek; Olli-P Kallioniemi; Heli Nevanlinna
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-07-28       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  A note on the estimation of relative risks of rare genetic susceptibility markers.

Authors:  C B Begg; M Berwick
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Heterozygous germ line hCHK2 mutations in Li-Fraumeni syndrome.

Authors:  D W Bell; J M Varley; T E Szydlo; D H Kang; D C Wahrer; K E Shannon; M Lubratovich; S J Verselis; K J Isselbacher; J F Fraumeni; J M Birch; F P Li; J E Garber; D A Haber
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-12-24       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Chk2/hCds1 functions as a DNA damage checkpoint in G(1) by stabilizing p53.

Authors:  N H Chehab; A Malikzay; M Appel; T D Halazonetis
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Low-penetrance susceptibility to breast cancer due to CHEK2(*)1100delC in noncarriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Ans van den Ouweland; Jan Klijn; Marijke Wasielewski; Anja de Snoo; Rogier Oldenburg; Antoinette Hollestelle; Mark Houben; Ellen Crepin; Monique van Veghel-Plandsoen; Fons Elstrodt; Cornelia van Duijn; Carina Bartels; Carel Meijers; Mieke Schutte; Lesley McGuffog; Deborah Thompson; Douglas Easton; Nayanta Sodha; Sheila Seal; Rita Barfoot; Jon Mangion; Jenny Chang-Claude; Diana Eccles; Rosalind Eeles; D Gareth Evans; Richard Houlston; Victoria Murday; Steven Narod; Tamara Peretz; Julian Peto; Catherine Phelan; Hong Xiang Zhang; Csilla Szabo; Peter Devilee; David Goldgar; P Andrew Futreal; Katherine L Nathanson; Barbara Weber; Nazneen Rahman; Michael R Stratton
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-04-22       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Mutation analysis of the CHK2 gene in families with hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  M Allinen; P Huusko; S Mäntyniemi; V Launonen; R Winqvist
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-07-20       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total
  28 in total

1.  CHEK2*1100delC and susceptibility to breast cancer: a collaborative analysis involving 10,860 breast cancer cases and 9,065 controls from 10 studies.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Clinical implications of low-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility alleles.

Authors:  Francis Freisinger; Susan M Domchek
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Non-reporting and inconsistent reporting of race and ethnicity in articles that claim associations among genotype, outcome, and race or ethnicity.

Authors:  H Shanawani; L Dame; D A Schwartz; R Cook-Deegan
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  The CHEK2 1100delC allele is not relevant for risk assessment in HNPCC and HBCC Spanish families.

Authors:  Ana Sánchez de Abajo; Miguel de la Hoya; Javier Godino; Vicente Furió; Alicia Tosar; Pedro Pérez-Segura; Eduardo Díaz-Rubio; Trinidad Caldés
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  The TP53 mutational spectrum and frequency of CHEK2*1100delC in Li-Fraumeni-like kindreds.

Authors:  Rina Siddiqui; Kenan Onel; Flavia Facio; Kedoudja Nafa; Louis Robles Diaz; Noah Kauff; Helen Huang; Mark Robson; Nathan Ellis; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Association Between CHEK2*1100delC and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mingming Liang; Yun Zhang; Chenyu Sun; Feras Kamel Rizeq; Min Min; Tingting Shi; Yehuan Sun
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.074

7.  Identification and characterization of novel SNPs in CHEK2 in Ashkenazi Jewish men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marc D Tischkowitz; Ahmet Yilmaz; Long Q Chen; Danielle M Karyadi; David Novak; Tomas Kirchhoff; Nancy Hamel; Sean V Tavtigian; Suzanne Kolb; Tarek A Bismar; Raquel Aloyz; Peter S Nelson; Lee Hood; Steven A Narod; Kirsten A White; Elaine A Ostrander; William B Isaacs; Kenneth Offit; Kathleen A Cooney; Janet L Stanford; William D Foulkes
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 8.679

8.  CHEK2*1100delC does not contribute to risk to breast cancer among Malay, Chinese and Indians in Malaysia.

Authors:  Eswary Thirthagiri; Leng San Cheong; Cheng Har Yip; Soo-Hwang Teo
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Genetic and functional analysis of CHEK2 (CHK2) variants in multiethnic cohorts.

Authors:  Daphne W Bell; Sang H Kim; Andrew K Godwin; Taryn A Schiripo; Patricia L Harris; Sara M Haserlat; Doke C R Wahrer; Christopher A Haiman; Mary B Daly; Kristin B Niendorf; Matthew R Smith; Dennis C Sgroi; Judy E Garber; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Loic Le Marchand; Brian E Henderson; David Altshuler; Daniel A Haber; Matthew L Freedman
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 10.  Update on hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  Karen Lisa Smith; Mark E Robson
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.