Literature DB >> 19804599

Principles of genetic predisposition to malignancies.

Tadeusz Debniak1, Jan Lubinski.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19804599      PMCID: PMC2735752          DOI: 10.1186/1897-4287-6-2-69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract        ISSN: 1731-2302            Impact factor:   2.857


× No keyword cloud information.

It is estimated that around 30% of all malignancies are caused by a "high-risk" genetic predisposition [1]. This estimation is based on an evaluation of occurrence of disease among monozygotic twins. If one of them is affected with prostate (PC) or breast cancer (BC), then the probability of occurrence of this disease in the second sibling is 40% for PC and 30% for BC [2]. The concordance among monozygotic twins is even higher when occurrence of malignancies regardless of the site of origin is taken into consideration (e.g. breast cancer in one individual, stomach cancer in the sibling). Genetic susceptibility to cancer can be divided into monogenic and polygenic predisposition.

Monogenic predisposition to cancer

Such diseases are caused by constitutional mutations of single genes, present in all cells of the body. DNA mutations can be detected in all malignancies. In the majority of cases somatic mutations are identified -changes which are present in malignant tissue only. To date, among hereditary causes of malignancies, the most frequently diagnosed background detected in routine molecular testing of the patients is monogenic predisposition with autosomal dominant type of inheritance. Each individual has two copies (alleles) of the gene responsible for a particular feature or disease, in the same locus on homologous chromosomes. One copy is inherited from the mother, the second one from the father. According to autosomal dominant type of inheritance the presence of inborn mutation in a single copy of the gene leads to disorder [3]. This is true in the case of proto-oncogenes, e.g. mutations in RET oncogene predispose to MEN2 syndrome. In the majority of cases, malignancies are caused by mutations of the tumour suppressor genes such as p53, or DNA repair genes such as MSH2, which show a recessive pattern at the molecular level. Carriers of these mutations develop cancer due to somatic inactivation of the second allele (most frequently deletion) during their lifetime [4-8]. Pedigrees of monogenic diseases with autosomal dominant inheritance are characterised by occurrence of the disorder in all generations (vertical transmission), among men and women, among almost 50% of the relatives [9,10]. The pedigree of a family with autosomal dominant disease is presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Family with Lynch syndrome - pedigree features of monogenic autosomal dominant disease.

Family with Lynch syndrome - pedigree features of monogenic autosomal dominant disease. In this particular family cancers occur at a younger age in each subsequent generation (so-called anticipation). Autosomal dominant inheritance does not show characteristic pedigree features in cases of: • germline (present in sex cells) mutations arising "de novo" - disease absent among ancestors and siblings of the proband (individuals undergoing genetic counselling); subsequent generations can be affected - Figure 2;
Figure 2

Pedigree of family with disease caused by germline "de novo" mutation within .

Pedigree of family with disease caused by germline "de novo" mutation within . • mosaic mutation present only in some of the tissues; such alterations arise in the fetus "de novo" during pregnancy; single individuals in the family are affected; mutation can be inherited only if it is present in sex cells; • "low penetrance" mutations; penetrance is defined as the proportion of carriers of mutation who develop cancer; in strong cancer familial aggregations it reaches 80-90%, but in cases with low penetrance mutations it is much lower, and thus single individuals only are affected [11-15]; an example is presented in Figure 3;
Figure 3

Pedigree of family with low penetrance .

Pedigree of family with low penetrance . • mutations predisposing to disease occurring among one gender only, e.g. mutations of the BRCA1 gene are detected among both males and females, but only women develop ovarian cancer; • small families with low numbers of relatives. Evaluation of the pedigree and clinical data of families with aggregations of cancers should exclude phenocopies (accidental malignancy not related to mutation responsible for the aggregation of malignant tumours) [16-18]. Figure 4 shows an example of a family with 4 breast cancers caused by BRCA1 mutation and one breast cancer in a woman without BRCA1 mutation.
Figure 4

Phenocopy - breast cancer unrelated to constitutional mutation in family with .

Phenocopy - breast cancer unrelated to constitutional mutation in family with .

Polygenic predisposition to cancer

In polygenic type of inheritance single individuals are usually affected. As the results of the studies performed in our centre panels of DNA mutations/polymorphisms, which increase the risk of malignancies, were identified in over 90% of unselected breast cancers (96% of cases with BC diagnosed over 50, 99% of lobular cancer cases - Tables 1, 2, 3), 89% of colorectal cancers, 72% of malignant melanomas, 36% of ovarian and 27.5% of prostate cancers [19]. DNA alterations associated with "moderate" risk may have a significant clinical impact.
Table 1

Frequency of identified panel of markers in unselected breast Cancers and controls [9]

Gene/MarkerCancerControls
BRCA12.7% (26/977)0% (0/977)

CHEK211.9% (113/951)6% (59/977)

p5310.1% (85/838)5.7% (52/918)

TNR55.6% (419/753)45.8% (397/866)

FGFR - GG18.3% (61/334)13.9% (65/469)

CDKN2A7% (19/273)5.4% (22/404)

XPD - GG41% (104/254)36.4% (139/382)

XPD - CC/AA17.3% (26/150)14% (34/243)

BRCA27.3% (9/124)4.8% (10/209)

XPD - AA20% (23/115)18.6% (37/199)

Any marker90.6% (885/977)83.4% (815/977)

StatisticP = 3 × 10 -6
Table 2

Frequency of identified panel of markers in lobular carcinoma and controls [9]

Gene/MarkerCancerControls
BRCA10.7% (1/140)0% (0/140)

CHEK219.4% (27/139)4.3% (6/140)

p5310.7% (12/112)6% (8/134)

BRCA29% (9/100)4.8% (9/126)

FGFR - nAA75.8% (69/91)60% (72/120)

TNR72.7% (16/22)39.6% (19/48)

NOD216.7% (1/6)0% (0/29)

M3K - nAA80% (4/5)41.4% (12/29)

Any marker99.30% (139/140)87.90% (123/140)

StatisticP = 0.00073
Table 3

Frequency of identified panel of markers in all breast cancers diagnosed at age above 50 and controls [9]

Gene/MarkerCancerControls
BRCA12.1% (14/667)0% (0/667)

CHEK211% (72/653)4.8% (32/667)

p5311% (64/581)5.4% (34/635)

TNR55.9% (289/517)45.3% (272/601)

FGFR - nAA68.9% (157/228)60.8% (200/329)

BRCA25.6% (4/71)2.3% (3/129)

XPD - CC/AA13.4% (9/67)6.3% (8/126)

NOD213.8% (8/58)6.8% (8/118)

XPD - GG48% (24/50)35.5% (39/110)

Any marker96.1% (641/667)89.4% (596/667)

StatisticP = 2.4 × 10 -6
Frequency of identified panel of markers in unselected breast Cancers and controls [9] Frequency of identified panel of markers in lobular carcinoma and controls [9] Frequency of identified panel of markers in all breast cancers diagnosed at age above 50 and controls [9] Associations of "moderate risk" mutations and polymorphisms of many genes and additional influence of environmental factors can significantly increase the risk of cancer development in individuals carrying these alterations. Accumulation (linear association) of the DNA alterations can be identified when the total risk of cancer is the sum of risks of single DNA alterations, e.g. total risk of cancer development increased twofold in compound carriers of two mutations in genes A and B (both mutations associated with 50% increased cancer risk). In other cases a non-linear association (interaction) can be diagnosed (e.g. total risk increased fivefold in compound carriers of the previously mentioned mutations of genes A and B [20]).
  18 in total

Review 1.  The Swedish Twin Registry: a unique resource for clinical, epidemiological and genetic studies.

Authors:  P Lichtenstein; U De Faire; B Floderus; M Svartengren; P Svedberg; N L Pedersen
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 2.  Genetic testing and counseling for hereditary forms of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  G M Petersen; J D Brensinger; K A Johnson; F M Giardiello
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  A protein truncating BRCA1 allele with a low penetrance of breast cancer.

Authors:  B Gorski; J Menkiszak; J Gronwald; J Lubinski; S A Narod
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Genetics and epidemiology, congenital anomalies and cancer.

Authors:  J M Friedman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Phenocopies in breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) families: implications for genetic counselling.

Authors:  Jacek Gronwald; Cezary Cybulski; Jan Lubinski; Steven A Narod
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Common variants of DNA repair genes and malignant melanoma.

Authors:  T Debniak; R J Scott; B Górski; C Cybulski; T van de Wetering; P Serrano-Fernandez; T Huzarski; T Byrski; L Nagay; B Debniak; E Kowalska; A Jakubowska; J Gronwald; D Wokolorczyk; R Maleszka; J Kładny; J Lubinski
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 7.  Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer and lost cell polarity: a short path to cancer.

Authors:  Bostjan Humar; Parry Guilford
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.404

8.  Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblastoma.

Authors:  A G Knudson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Identification of susceptibility genes for cancer in a genome-wide scan: results from the colon neoplasia sibling study.

Authors:  Denise Daley; Susan Lewis; Petra Platzer; Melissa MacMillen; Joseph Willis; Robert C Elston; Sanford D Markowitz; Georgia L Wiesner
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 10.  Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: the syndrome, the genes, and historical perspectives.

Authors:  G Marra; C R Boland
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-08-02       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.