Literature DB >> 18455309

Scopolamine impairs auditory delayed matching-to-sample performance in monkeys.

Bethany Plakke1, Chi-Wing Ng, Amy Poremba.   

Abstract

Information concerning the major neurotransmitters critical for auditory memory is sparse. One possibility is the cholinergic system, important for performance in some tasks requiring visual short-term memory and attention [T.G. Aigner, M. Mishkin, The effects of physostigmine and scopolamine on recognition memory in monkeys, Behav. Neural. Biol. 45 (1986) 81-87; N. Hironaka, K. Ando, Effects of cholinergic drugs on scopolamine-induced memory impairment in rhesus monkeys, Jpn. J. Psychopharmacol. 16 (1996) 103-108; T.M. Myers, G. Galbicka, M.L. Sipos, S. Varadi, J.L. Oubre, M.G. Clark, Effects of anticholinergics on serial-probe recognition accuracy of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 73 (2002) 829-834; H. Ogura, T.G. Aigner, MK-801 Impairs recognition memory in rhesus monkeys: comparison with cholinergic drugs, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 266 (1993) 60-64; D.M. Penetar, J.H. McDonough Jr., Effects of cholinergic drugs on delayed match-to-sample performance of rhesus monkeys, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 19 (1983) 963-967; M.A. Taffe, M.R. Weed, L.H. Gold, Scopolamine alters rhesus monkey performance on a novel neuropsychological test battery, Cogn. Brain Res. 8 (1999) 203-212]. Five rhesus monkeys were trained to perform an auditory go/no-go delayed matching-to-sample (DMTS) task wherein two acoustic stimuli (500ms), separated by variable memory delays (500ms, 2500ms, or 5000ms), were either identical sound presentations, i.e., match trials, or two different sound presentations, i.e., nonmatch trials. Sound stimuli were chosen semi-randomly from a large set sound set ( approximately 900). After reaching a criterion of 80% correct on the behavioral task, monkeys were injected with saline or doses of scopolamine hydrochloride mixed in saline (3 microg, 5 microg, and 10 microg per 1kg of weight), 30 min before training. Scopolamine impaired performance accuracy on match trials in a dose-dependent manner. Blocking muscarinic receptors with scopolamine did not significantly impair motor responses, food motivation, or responses to rewarded sound. These findings support the hypothesis that the cholinergic system is important for auditory short-term memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18455309      PMCID: PMC2696804          DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  39 in total

1.  Parallel visuospatial and audiospatial working memory processes in the monkey dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Y Kikuchi-Yorioka; T Sawaguchi
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  An auditory domain in primate prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Lizabeth M Romanski; Patricia S Goldman-Rakic
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Scopolamine and Pavlovian fear conditioning in rats: dose-effect analysis.

Authors:  S G Anagnostaras; S Maren; J R Sage; S Goodrich; M S Fanselow
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Neurotoxic lesions of perirhinal cortex impair visual recognition memory in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  L Málková; J Bachevalier; M Mishkin; R C Saunders
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Spectral integration plasticity in cat auditory cortex induced by perceptual training.

Authors:  M Diane Keeling; Barbara M Calhoun; Katharina Krüger; Daniel B Polley; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Auditory associative memory and representational plasticity in the primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Norman M Weinberger
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Dissociable roles of the posterior parietal and the prefrontal cortex in manipulation and monitoring processes.

Authors:  Anne Sophie Champod; Michael Petrides
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Scopolamine alters rhesus monkey performance on a novel neuropsychological test battery.

Authors:  M A Taffe; M R Weed; L H Gold
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1999-10-25

9.  Prefrontal acetylcholine release controls cue detection on multiple timescales.

Authors:  Vinay Parikh; Rouba Kozak; Vicente Martinez; Martin Sarter
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Effects of anticholinergics on serial-probe recognition accuracy of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Todd M Myers; Gregory Galbicka; Maurice L Sipos; Suzanne Varadi; John L Oubre; Matthew G Clark
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.533

View more
  9 in total

1.  Cholinergic modulation of working memory activity in primate prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Xin Zhou; Xue-Lian Qi; Kristy Douglas; Kathini Palaninathan; Hyun Sug Kang; Jerry J Buccafusco; David T Blake; Christos Constantinidis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Brain Network Activation (BNA) reveals scopolamine-induced impairment of visual working memory.

Authors:  Amit Reches; Naama Levy-Cooperman; Ilan Laufer; Revital Shani-Hershkovitch; Keren Ziv; Dani Kerem; Noga Gal; Yaki Stern; Guy Cukierman; Myroslava K Romach; Edward M Sellers; Amir B Geva
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.444

3.  Effects of acute administration of nicotinic and muscarinic cholinergic agonists and antagonists on performance in different cost-benefit decision making tasks in rats.

Authors:  Ian A Mendez; Ryan J Gilbert; Jennifer L Bizon; Barry Setlow
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Muscarinic receptor occupancy and cognitive impairment: a PET study with [11C](+)3-MPB and scopolamine in conscious monkeys.

Authors:  Shigeyuki Yamamoto; Shingo Nishiyama; Masahiro Kawamata; Hiroyuki Ohba; Tomoyasu Wakuda; Nori Takei; Hideo Tsukada; Edward F Domino
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  The role of M1 muscarinic cholinergic receptors in the discriminative stimulus properties of N-desmethylclozapine and the atypical antipsychotic drug clozapine in rats.

Authors:  Adam J Prus; Alan L Pehrson; Scott D Philibin; Jesse T Wood; Sarah A Vunck; Joseph H Porter
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Cholinergic control of visual categorization in macaques.

Authors:  Nikolaos C Aggelopoulos; Stefanie Liebe; Nikos K Logothetis; Gregor Rainer
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Effects of acetylcholine on neuronal properties in entorhinal cortex.

Authors:  James G Heys; Nathan W Schultheiss; Christopher F Shay; Yusuke Tsuno; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Neural correlates of short-term memory in primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  James Bigelow; Breein Rossi; Amy Poremba
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 9.  Neuromodulation of Persistent Activity and Working Memory Circuitry in Primate Prefrontal Cortex by Muscarinic Receptors.

Authors:  Susheel Vijayraghavan; Stefan Everling
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.492

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.