OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence and incidence of chronic fatigue syndrome in Olmsted County, Minnesota, using the 1994 case definition and describe exclusionary and comorbid conditions observed in patients who presented for evaluation of long-standing fatigue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective medical record review of potential cases of chronic fatigue syndrome identified from January 1, 1998, through December 31, 2002, using the Rochester Epidemiology Project, a population-based database. Patients were classified as having chronic fatigue syndrome if the medical record review documented fatigue of 6 months' duration, at least 4 of 8 chronic fatigue syndrome-defining symptoms, and symptoms that interfered with daily work or activities. Patients not meeting all of the criteria were classified as having insufficient/idiopathic fatigue. RESULTS: We identified 686 potential patients with chronic fatigue, 2 of whom declined consent for medical record review. Of the remaining 684 patients, 151 (22%) met criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome or insufficient/idiopathic fatigue. The overall prevalence and incidence of chronic fatigue syndrome and insufficient/idiopathic fatigue were 71.34 per 100,000 persons and 13.16 per 100,000 person-years vs 73.70 per 100,000 persons and 13.58 per 100,000 person-years, respectively. The potential cases included 482 patients (70%) who had an exclusionary condition, and almost half the patients who met either criterion had at least one nonexclusionary comorbid condition. CONCLUSION: The incidence and prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome and insufficient/idiopathic fatigue are relatively low in Olmsted County. Careful clinical evaluation to identify whether fatigue could be attributed to exclusionary or comorbid conditions rather than chronic fatigue syndrome itself will ensure appropriate assessment for patients without chronic fatigue syndrome.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence and incidence of chronic fatigue syndrome in Olmsted County, Minnesota, using the 1994 case definition and describe exclusionary and comorbid conditions observed in patients who presented for evaluation of long-standing fatigue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective medical record review of potential cases of chronic fatigue syndrome identified from January 1, 1998, through December 31, 2002, using the Rochester Epidemiology Project, a population-based database. Patients were classified as having chronic fatigue syndrome if the medical record review documented fatigue of 6 months' duration, at least 4 of 8 chronic fatigue syndrome-defining symptoms, and symptoms that interfered with daily work or activities. Patients not meeting all of the criteria were classified as having insufficient/idiopathic fatigue. RESULTS: We identified 686 potential patients with chronic fatigue, 2 of whom declined consent for medical record review. Of the remaining 684 patients, 151 (22%) met criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome or insufficient/idiopathic fatigue. The overall prevalence and incidence of chronic fatigue syndrome and insufficient/idiopathic fatigue were 71.34 per 100,000 persons and 13.16 per 100,000 person-years vs 73.70 per 100,000 persons and 13.58 per 100,000 person-years, respectively. The potential cases included 482 patients (70%) who had an exclusionary condition, and almost half the patients who met either criterion had at least one nonexclusionary comorbid condition. CONCLUSION: The incidence and prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome and insufficient/idiopathic fatigue are relatively low in Olmsted County. Careful clinical evaluation to identify whether fatigue could be attributed to exclusionary or comorbid conditions rather than chronic fatigue syndrome itself will ensure appropriate assessment for patients without chronic fatigue syndrome.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Jennifer L St Sauver; Brandon R Grossardt; Barbara P Yawn; L Joseph Melton; Walter A Rocca Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-03-23 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: William C Reeves; James F Jones; Elizabeth Maloney; Christine Heim; David C Hoaglin; Roumiana S Boneva; Marjorie Morrissey; Rebecca Devlin Journal: Popul Health Metr Date: 2007-06-08
Authors: Rosane Nisenbaum; James F Jones; Elizabeth R Unger; Michele Reyes; William C Reeves Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2003-10-03 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: April F Mohanty; Lisa M McAndrew; Drew Helmer; Matthew H Samore; Adi V Gundlapalli Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Landrew S Sevel; Jeff Boissoneault; Janelle E Letzen; Michael E Robinson; Roland Staud Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Inger Johanne Bakken; Kari Tveito; Nina Gunnes; Sara Ghaderi; Camilla Stoltenberg; Lill Trogstad; Siri Eldevik Håberg; Per Magnus Journal: BMC Med Date: 2014-10-01 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Dana J Brimmer; Elizabeth Maloney; Rebecca Devlin; James F Jones; Roumiana Boneva; Caryn Nagler; Lisa LeRoy; Scott Royal; Hao Tian; Jin-Mann S Lin; Jennifer Kasten; Elizabeth R Unger Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2013-08-02