Literature DB >> 15528108

A complex way to compute fMRI activation.

Daniel B Rowe1, Brent R Logan.   

Abstract

In functional magnetic resonance imaging, voxel time courses after Fourier or non-Fourier "image reconstruction" are complex valued as a result of phase imperfections due to magnetic field inhomogeneities. Nearly all fMRI studies derive functional "activation" based on magnitude voxel time courses [Bandettini, P., Jesmanowicz, A., Wong, E., Hyde, J.S., 1993. Processing strategies for time-course data sets in functional MRI of the human brain. Magn. Reson. Med. 30 (2): 161-173 and Cox, R.W., Jesmanowicz, A., Hyde, J.S., 1995. Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 33 (2): 230-236]. Here, we propose to directly model the entire complex or bivariate data rather than just the magnitude-only data. A nonlinear multiple regression model is used to model activation of the complex signal, and a likelihood ratio test is derived to determine activation in each voxel. We investigate the performance of the model on a real dataset, then compare the magnitude-only and complex models under varying signal-to-noise ratios in a simulation study with varying activation contrast effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15528108     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.06.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  28 in total

1.  Two-axis acceleration of functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging by parallel excitation of phase-tagged slices and half k-space acceleration.

Authors:  Andrzej Jesmanowicz; Andrew S Nencka; Shi-Jiang Li; James S Hyde
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2011

2.  Macrovascular contribution in activation patterns of working memory.

Authors:  Dardo G Tomasi; Elisabeth C Caparelli
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 6.200

3.  Characterizing phase-only fMRI data with an angular regression model.

Authors:  Daniel B Rowe; Christopher P Meller; Raymond G Hoffmann
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Signal and noise of Fourier reconstructed fMRI data.

Authors:  Daniel B Rowe; Andrew S Nencka; Raymond G Hoffmann
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  COmplex-Model-Based Estimation of thermal noise for fMRI data in the presence of artifacts.

Authors:  Yin Xu; Gaohong Wu; Daniel B Rowe; Yuan Ma; Rongyan Zhang; Guofan Xu; Shi-Jiang Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Magnitude and phase signal detection in complex-valued fMRI data.

Authors:  Daniel B Rowe
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  The impact of vascular factors on language localization in the superior temporal sulcus.

Authors:  Stephen M Wilson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Improving robustness and reliability of phase-sensitive fMRI analysis using temporal off-resonance alignment of single-echo timeseries (TOAST).

Authors:  Andrew D Hahn; Andrew S Nencka; Daniel B Rowe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging brain activation directly from k-space.

Authors:  Daniel B Rowe; Andrew D Hahn; Andrew S Nencka
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  Separation of parallel encoded complex-valued slices (SPECS) from a single complex-valued aliased coil image.

Authors:  Daniel B Rowe; Iain P Bruce; Andrew S Nencka; James S Hyde; Mary C Kociuba
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 2.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.