Literature DB >> 19455343

Mucosal colonic tube fistula with antireflux wrap for antegrade colonic enema.

Brendon Douglas Bowkett1, E W Kelly.   

Abstract

Antegrade enemas can provide children with excellent faecal continence in situations where adequate control has been compromised because of underlying congential anomaly or poor surgical outcome in their treatment. The enema is often delivered through an appendicostomy. If the appendix is absent or utilized for another purpose, then placement of a chait tube or caecostomy button can provide access to the colon for the enema. However, these devices may be associated with breakages, accidental removal and leakage and replacement may require another operative procedure under a general anaesthetic. Full thickness colonic tubes can also be constructed at any point along the colon but in the author's experience, they can be associated with significant leakage of both gas and faecal material. The construction of a mucosal colonic tube with anti-reflux wrap is a technique that avoids the above problems and offers a distinctive advantage in selected situations. The technique relies on tabularising mucosa alone to create a continent fistula. Six children with severe soiling underwent the technique. The outcomes were evaluated using a modified quality of life score (QOLI). The score included assessment of soiling, staining, odour, self-esteem and socialization measure. Technical evaluation included analysis of the ease of catheterization and continence of the mucosal fistula site. All six patients had dramatic improvement in their faecal continence with complete resolution of soiling in all six. Follow up median is 42 months and the range is 6-48 months. QOLI scores improved from a total of 4.75 to 18.5. Possible range is 0-21. All the six fistula sites catheterize easily and no stenosis or faecal leakage has occurred. Two patients required treatment of minor granulations at the entry site of the fistula during the early healing phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19455343     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-009-2379-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  7 in total

1.  Preliminary report: the antegrade continence enema.

Authors:  P S Malone; P G Ransley; E M Kiely
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-11-17       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  The Malone antegrade continence enema.

Authors:  D M Griffiths; P S Malone
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.545

3.  Caecal flap conduit for antegrade continence enemas.

Authors:  E M Kiely; N Ade-Ajayi; R A Wheeler
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Early experience with the laparoscopic ace procedure.

Authors:  R W Robertson; A C Lynch; S W Beasley; P N Morreau
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1999-04

5.  Long-term follow-up of dynamic graciloplasty for faecal incontinence.

Authors:  M J Thornton; M L Kennedy; D Z Lubowski; D W King
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  Tube sigmoidostomy: a modification of the antegrade colonic evacuation.

Authors:  Erica Whineray Kelly; Brendon Bowkett
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.872

7.  The Macedo-Malone antegrade continence enema procedure: early experience.

Authors:  Adriano Almeida Calado; Antonio Macedo; Ubirajara Barroso; José Murillo Netto; Riberto Liguori; Mauricio Hachul; Gilmar Garrone; Valdemar Ortiz; Miguel Srougi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.450

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.