Literature DB >> 15517634

Assessment of the 3-dimensional Fastrak measurement system in measuring range of motion in ankylosing spondylitis.

Kelvin Jordan1, Kirstie L Haywood, Krysia Dziedzic, Andrew M Garratt, Peter W Jones, Bie Nio Ong, Peter T Dawes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the repeatability and validity of the electromagnetic 3-dimensional tracking system, Fastrak, in measuring cervical spine and shoulder movement in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
METHODS: Fifty patients with AS had their cervical spine and shoulder movements measured on up to 3 occasions with the Fastrak. Patients also completed disease-specific and generic patient assessed health instruments, and their spinal mobility was assessed by tape measure methods. Repeatability over 2 weeks was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Fastrak measurements were compared between patients with different self-ratings of AS related health. Comparisons between the Fastrak measurements and patient assessed health instruments and tape measurements were made using Spearman correlations and multilevel modeling.
RESULTS: Patients with AS tended to be limited in both cervical spine and shoulder movements. ICC were all > 0.80 (except shoulder extension, 0.75), indicating substantial reliability. Fastrak was able to differentiate between patients with a high self-rating of AS related health and those with a poorer rating. Cervical spine flexion and shoulder flexion and abduction were most strongly related to the patient assessed health instruments, although the shoulder movements had limited relationships with the tape measurements of spinal mobility.
CONCLUSION: The Fastrak appears to be reliable and valid in an AS population. Shoulder movements tended to have a stronger relationship with the patient assessed health instruments than cervical spine movements. Shoulder movement may be more related to everyday function measured by these instruments, which indicates the importance of this joint in assessment of AS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15517634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  8 in total

1.  Motion is reduced in the unstable spine with the use of mechanical devices for bed transfers.

Authors:  Calvin T Hu; Christian P Dipaola; Bryan P Conrad; Marybeth Horodyski; Gianluca Del Rossi; Glenn R Rechtine
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Validation of a new objective index to measure spinal mobility: the University of Cordoba Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (UCOASMI).

Authors:  Juan L Garrido-Castro; Alejandro Escudero; Rafael Medina-Carnicer; Alfonso M Galisteo; Cristina Gonzalez-Navas; Loreto Carmona; Eduardo Collantes-Estevez
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Wearable systems for shoulder kinematics assessment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Arianna Carnevale; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Emiliano Schena; Carlo Massaroni; Daniela Lo Presti; Alessandra Berton; Vincenzo Candela; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Regional differences in lumbar spinal posture and the influence of low back pain.

Authors:  Tim Mitchell; Peter B O'Sullivan; Angus F Burnett; Leon Straker; Anne Smith
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 5.  Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chantal H P de Koning; Sylvia P van den Heuvel; J Bart Staal; Bouwien C M Smits-Engelsman; Erik J M Hendriks
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Validation of the German version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI).

Authors:  Holger Cramer; Romy Lauche; Jost Langhorst; Gustav J Dobos; Andreas Michalsen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Reliability of the universal goniometer for assessing active cervical range of motion in asymptomatic healthy persons.

Authors:  Muhammad Nazim Farooq; Mohammad A Mohseni Bandpei; Mudassar Ali; Ghazanfar Ali Khan
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

8.  Changes in trunk posture and muscle responses in standing during pregnancy and postpartum.

Authors:  Gemma Biviá-Roig; Juan Francisco Lisón; Daniel Sánchez-Zuriaga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.